The Derek Hunter Show · WMAL | CMLS Washington DC

Hour 1 March 17th, 2026

·36 min·2 clips
Joe Kent says Iran posed 'no imminent threat' and blames 'pressure from Israel and its powerful American lobby.'
The host opens the hour casually. He starts with Mick Day banter, jokes about being part Irish, and explains why corned beef and cabbage can wait until the weekend because he will not be home and the kids do not want it anyway. Jeff is back. He says the phone lines are open at 888-630-9625 and sets the table for a busy hour, then moves on before the mood can settle. The pace stays brisk. He pivots into a wider argument about the world stage, how countries build relationships for convenience rather than friendship, and why waiting for a threat to become obvious can mean waiting too long. Then the focus sharpens. He pulls apart Joe Kent's language about war, Syria, and Israel, and he treats the idea that Israel manufactured the war as an accusation that needs a lot more proof than it gets. He gets blunt. He says Kent's wife was killed by ISIS in Syria and argues that Israel had nothing to do with it, which he treats as a tragedy that should not be turned into a conspiracy. The show gets sharper. He questions the habit of using military service as a shield from criticism and says veterans usually do not lead with that background unless they want to head off pushback. No softness here. He keeps pressing on the logic behind claims about imminent threats, asking whether people should wait for an assassin to have the president in the crosshairs before admitting the danger was real. The point keeps tightening. He ties the argument back to earlier warnings about Iran and points out that Kent has tweeted repeatedly about Iranian threats to Trump, which makes the current stance look inconsistent. He does not let it go. The hour keeps circling the same fault line: whether danger should be judged by what has already happened or by the planning and positioning that can be seen before the blow lands. The tone stays combative. He uses sarcasm, moral judgment, and rapid follow-through to keep the argument moving instead of pausing for neutrality. He sounds certain. That certainty is part of the show's engine, and it gives the segment the feel of a host cross-examining a claim until something gives way. The callers and phone setup sit in the background. They keep the sense that this is a live talk-radio hour built for reaction, not a carefully paced seminar. The holiday opener matters too. It gives the segment a loose, personal start before the politics tightens and the temperature rises. His style is not subtle. He prefers to answer big claims with mockery, disbelief, and a running insistence that context matters more than slogans. By the end, the central question is clear. The hour is built for listeners who want a fast, opinionated monologue about foreign policy, rhetoric, and double standards without much interest in polite hedging.

As heard by us

A fast, combative hour that turns a holiday opener into a hard foreign-policy argument.

Hour 1 opens with Mick Day banter before settling into a hard-edged argument about Iran, Israel, Joe Kent, and what counts as an imminent threat.

Read the full review in PlayNext →

Why you'd press play

You get a brisk, combative take on Mick Day banter, then a hard turn into Iran, Israel, and when a threat becomes imminent.

Read the full recommendation in PlayNext →
Listen to the show on