The Dangerous History Podcast · CJ

DHP Ep. 130 Reissue: CJ’s 25 Favorite Antiwar Songs

·1 hr 8 min·4 clips
Fortunate Son turns class resentment into a Vietnam-era protest anthem.
CJ opens by marking November 2025 and the approaching 107th Armistice Day, which he still deliberately calls Armistice Day. He says this is the sequel he has meant to make for several years. The original antiwar-songs list came out in late 2016. He notes that the earlier episode got really good feedback and that his audience is much larger now than it was then. Some of the songs in the new list were close contenders back then. Others were left out only because the list had to stop somewhere. He says he agonized over trimming the original list down to 25. He also says a number of the songs are newer discoveries, which makes the new episode feel less like a rerun and more like a second pass with more experience behind it. The show then moves into a broader historical frame. CJ mentions a book by Harry Stout and uses it to talk about how the Civil War was sold to both sides as a pure good-versus-evil conflict. He connects that framing to total war and to the way people stop asking what is justified once the cause has been sanctified. From there he turns to World War I. One of the songs he brings up is John McCutcheon’s "Christmas in the Trenches." He says he has probably mentioned it on the show at least a couple of times before. He describes the song as telling the story of Francis Tolliver, a young man from Liverpool who goes off to World War I and lives through the Christmas Truce. The truce itself is presented as one of those moments when rank-and-file soldiers briefly step outside the logic of the war machine. British, French, and German soldiers lay down their rifles, play soccer, and recognize one another as people rather than targets. CJ stresses that the truce happened spontaneously and against implied orders. He uses it to make the old point that the men in the trenches have more in common with each other than with the political and military leadership behind them. He also dwells on the song’s aftermath. Once the truce ends, it becomes harder to want to kill the men on the other side. CJ highlights the line about asking whose family has been placed in sight. That detail turns the song from a historical anecdote into a moral problem that lingers after the music stops. He also quotes the final verse moving back toward Liverpool, which underlines how the song ties battlefield horror to ordinary domestic life. The episode keeps that same blend of personal memory, political anger, and historical explanation throughout. It is not neutral about war. It is interested in how war is sold, how soldiers are trapped inside it, and how songs can hold onto the human cost when official language cannot. The final stretch reminds listeners that the Dangerous History podcast is still dependent on CJ’s own effort and on financial support. He says the show has been on life support financially because of catastrophes that have hit him and his family over the last six years or so. The ask is direct and unpolished, which matches the rest of the episode. It ends as a mix of playlist, argument, remembrance, and survival.

As heard by us

A searching anti-war playlist that turns songs into historical argument.

CJ anchors the episode in Armistice Day and picks up the thread from his 2016 anti-war songs list, which gives the whole piece a firm historical frame.

Read the full review in PlayNext →

Why you'd press play

Press play if you want anti-war songs tied to the history they argue with.

Read the full recommendation in PlayNext →
Listen to the show on