Should noise really be a veto on drone deliveries?

·27 min·2 clips

A reporter describes hearing a delivery drone overhead—it sounds like a lawnmower, but you barely notice it inside.

This episode of The Big Tech Show, hosted by Adrian Weckler with multimedia reporter Dara Nolan, examines the contentious rollout of drone delivery services in Ireland. They focus on the public debate over noise pollution, using the example of Manna's operations in Blanchardstown, Dublin 15. The discussion also covers insights from former UK Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg on Silicon Valley culture following his departure from Meta. Manna's drone delivery trial has created neighborhood disputes, with some residents valuing the convenience while others oppose the noise. Dara Nolan observed a drone in Blanchardstown, comparing its sound to a lawnmower when lowering a package at 14 meters. Inside a house, the noise was a low hum, but outside it was more noticeable, especially with the visual cue. Opposition is organized, with multiple residents' associations in areas like Dundrum and Glasnevin objecting, particularly as a proposed base is near a church. The hosts contrast drone noise with accepted urban sounds like ambulance sirens, agricultural machinery, and petrol lawnmowers. The government's recent framework document on drone delivery, referenced by Transport Minister Eamon Ryan, is described as ambiguous, acknowledging noise concerns while endorsing the technology's future. Manna's founder Bobby Healy claims noise can be reduced from 59 to 56 decibels with lighter rotors and higher flight paths. A key insight is the argument that society tolerates necessary noise, raising the question of whether drone deliveries are a frivolous convenience or a legitimate service. Some opposition is framed as "technological determinism," where people feel forced to accept a new normal. The hosts note that government regulation is lagging, leaving local councillors to often side with vocal resident opposition. The convenience factor, like ordering coffee while working from home, is seen as a potential driver for public acceptance over time. The debate includes a critique of "snobbery" in arguments against delivering non-essential items like donuts, comparing it to existing food delivery services. Visually, the drones are described as large and unfamiliar, contributing to a dystopian unease for some. The tone is conversational and analytical, balancing on-the-ground reporting with policy discussion. The style is educational, presenting multiple perspectives without advocating a single conclusion. Listeners interested in urban planning, technology adoption, and public policy debates would find this episode engaging. Those seeking highly technical details on drone engineering or definitive solutions might find it less satisfying, as it focuses on the social and regulatory impasse.

As heard by us

A steady case for treating drone noise as a public cost, not just a technical detail.

The piece treats drone delivery as a plain public choice problem: whether the noise is tolerable, or whether homes, churches, and the edges of town should be left to carry that cost.

Read the full review in PlayNext →

Why you'd press play

If you're weighing convenience against neighborhood peace, this one goes straight at it.

Read the full recommendation in PlayNext →

Listen to the show on

Apple Podcasts Spotify

Play clips from this episode More from The Big Tech Show