Stacking Growth | The B2B Marketing Podcast · Refine Labs

Measuring Marketing: A Complete Breakdown

·1 hr 30 min·5 clips
Why a 400% ROI campaign can actually put less money in the bank than one with 150%.
Dale Harrison and Matt Cinella host this live episode of Stacking Growth, a B2B marketing podcast, to dissect the complexities of measuring marketing's true value. Harrison and Cinella argue that traditional marketing ROI, as defined by platforms like Facebook and HubSpot, is fundamentally flawed for most B2B contexts. They propose a new, defensible methodology focused on contribution margin rather than simple revenue. The hosts begin by critiquing the standard ROI formula of (revenue - marketing cost) / marketing cost, stating it uses the wrong metric because businesses run on profit margins, not revenue. They illustrate this with a hypothetical example where a "50% off sale" campaign shows a 400% revenue ROI but a 0% margin-based ROI, while a "better widgets" campaign with lower revenue shows a 25% margin-based return. Harrison explains that contribution margin—revenue minus the cost of goods sold (COGS) and the cost of sales—is the correct foundation for calculating marketing's return. He uses Amazon's early history as an example, noting it operated for years with positive contribution margin per unit while reinvesting profits into expansion. A key argument is that marketing acts like a "factory building," a necessary asset that amplifies sales efficiency rather than directly generating revenue. The hosts state that without marketing, sales teams spend excessive time prospecting and explaining unknown brands, leading to slower, costlier deals. They emphasize that "marketing sourced revenue" is a misleading concept in B2B, as every deal requires sales effort, and claiming sole credit undermines marketing's credibility. Harrison cites studies showing marketing activities have little influence on deal close rates once a prospect enters the sales pipeline, with internal customer processes like procurement being the larger factor. One surprising insight is that brand marketing, like a billboard campaign for niche research products, can produce immediate measurable impacts, such as increased branded search traffic, within hours of launch. The hosts claim 75% of a product's selection likelihood is determined by buyer brand awareness before they enter the market. They explain that brand marketing creates a "durable memory association" with effects that can persist for up to 90 days after a campaign ends, unlike performance marketing which only influences the 5% of buyers currently in-market. A critical technical point is that marketing costs must be time-shifted to align with revenue, as expenses in one quarter typically influence deals closed in the next, based on the average sales cycle length. The tone is educational and conversational, structured as a live workshop with direct audience questions integrated into the discussion. The style is heavily analytical, breaking down financial concepts like COGS, gross margin, and contribution margin with clear, business-focused examples. This episode is ideal for B2B marketing leaders, operations managers, and finance professionals seeking a rigorous framework to justify brand investments and communicate with CFOs. Listeners looking for quick tactical tips or discussions on specific marketing channels might find the high-level financial focus less immediately applicable.

As heard by us

A practical look at marketing ROI that stays focused on measurement.

The live-event format keeps the focus on marketing ROI as a measurement problem rather than a slogan. Dale Harrison and Matt Cinella keep circling timing, sales-cycle lag, and the limits of marketing's reach once a prospect moves into the sales process, which gives the…

Read the full review in PlayNext →

Why you'd press play

If you're tired of pretend ROI, this gives you a cleaner way to think.

Read the full recommendation in PlayNext →
Listen to the show on