Soft Skills Engineering · Jamison Dance and Dave Smith

Episode 459: Am I cutting edge and how to compliment someone who went from super jerk to super nice

·23 min·2 clips

Dave reveals the secret to summoning internet critics to evaluate your company's data architecture.

This episode of Soft Skills Engineering features hosts Dave Smith and Jameson Dance answering listener questions about workplace dynamics and engineering challenges. The first question comes from a senior engineer at a fintech startup struggling to evaluate their company's complex data integration architecture. This engineer cannot determine if their system is cutting-edge or a wasteful reinvention of the wheel, citing integrations between CRM, CDP, and data warehouse platforms. Dave suggests writing a boastful blog post about their "novel" system to attract critical feedback that reveals prior art or better solutions. Jameson believes the messy architecture is likely a common result of Conway's law, where organizational silos create disjointed software systems. They discuss how vendor case studies often highlight ideal, all-in-one customer relationships that may not reflect reality. The hosts note that intellectual property concerns are usually minimal for internal data plumbing, unlike core product code. A surprising suggestion involves using an LLM to analyze the architecture and help draft a public blog post. They acknowledge a company review policy can act as a safety net against sharing sensitive information. The second question is from "Lightly Salted Meow Mix," a senior engineer who wants to compliment a former tech lead who transformed from a workplace jerk into a supportive engineering manager. The hosts ponder whether to directly acknowledge the person's growth or simply praise their current positive demeanor. Dave proposes a compliment that appreciates the observable change, such as admiring the work done to become more approachable. Jameson recommends starting by praising the current behavior and seeing if the person opens the door to discussing their past. They agree the individual is likely self-aware of their previous conduct. The conversation touches on how such significant personal change often requires deliberate effort and can be inspiring to witness. The tone is conversational, humorous, and grounded in practical, experience-based advice. Listeners who enjoy candid discussions about software career nuances and navigating interpersonal office politics would appreciate this episode. Those seeking highly technical deep dives or scripted narratives might find it less engaging.

As heard by us

A blunt, useful tour through data sprawl and the etiquette of praising someone who has improved.

Soft Skills Engineering spends this hour on two familiar kinds of workplace friction: the knot behind CRM, CDP, data warehouse, and BI systems, and the awkward job of telling someone they used to be terrible and are better now.

Read the full review in PlayNext →

Why you'd press play

For when you need to untangle org-chart spaghetti and explain why enterprise systems rarely line up cleanly.

Read the full recommendation in PlayNext →

Listen to the show on

Apple Podcasts Spotify

Play clips from this episode More from Soft Skills Engineering