Slaycation: True Crimes, Murders, and Twisted Vacations · Kim Davis, Adam "Tex" Davis, Jerry Kolber; True Crime Podcast

A Bad Day in Bakersfield (Part 2)

·53 min·3 clips
Entomologists identified insects in the rental car that were native to Bakersfield, not Ohio or North Carolina.
1. Slaycation: True Crimes, Murders, and Twisted Vacations returns to Bakersfield, California, with A Bad Day in Bakersfield (Part 2). 2. Adam Tex-Davis hosts with Kim and Jerry Colbert, who react to the case and frame the forensic details. 3. The episode asks how Vincent Brothers’s alibi collapsed after investigators found insect evidence in a rental car. 4. The hosts revisit the murder of Joni Harper, her children, and Ernestine Harper in the family’s Bakersfield home. 5. They note that the house looked staged, with drawers pulled out and a purse emptied, but nothing of value taken. 6. They say there was no forced entry, no witness account, and no physical scene evidence that clearly pointed to an outsider. 7. Vincent Brothers’s phone records and credit-card activity initially placed him in Ohio and supported his trip plans. 8. A rental-car review showed the Dodge Neon had logged more than 5,400 miles in only a few days. 9. Security-camera footage in Columbus showed Vincent’s brother using the credit card at Walmart instead of Vincent. 10. Investigators found the rental car unusually filthy and started collecting debris from the floor mats, wheel wells, and cabin crevices. 11. Entomologists identified insect parts and larvae that were not found in Ohio, North Carolina, or along Vincent’s claimed route. 12. Those insects were native to California’s Central Valley, more specifically the Bakersfield area. 13. The larvae’s development stage let experts estimate when the insects had been alive in the car. 14. That timeframe lined up with the window when the murders occurred. 15. The hosts describe the insect evidence as the detail that finally moved the case from suspicion to proof. 16. They also say the phone and card activity no longer proved innocence, because they fit a deliberately constructed alibi. 17. The episode has an interview-style rhythm, with Adam and Kim trading reactions while Jerry adds commentary. 18. The tone mixes procedural explanation with disbelief as the forensic trail gets narrower. 19. Listeners who like forensic true-crime cases and alibi breakdowns. 20. Listeners who want gentle stories or low-intensity crime coverage.
Listen to the show on