Scrumbags Rugby Podcast · Pick and Drive Productions

REVIEW: Lions Clinch Series In Dramatic Fashion | Wallabies vs British and Irish Lions Second Test

·1 hr 7 min·4 clips
The Wallabies led for 79 minutes before the Lions scored in the last 30 seconds.
1. Scrumbags Rugby Podcast reviews the Wallabies' 29-26 second-test loss to the British and Irish Lions at the MCG. 2. Mitch hosts with Ando Anderson, a former Pick and Drive Rugby Podcast co-host, and John Ferguson from Off The Ruck. 3. The episode asks whether the final breakdown call on Carlo Tizzano and the second-half collapse explain the series result. 4. The hosts focus first on the disputed breakdown in the 79th minute and the contact on Tizzano's neck. 5. They reference law 9.20 and argue the contact was above the shoulders and therefore foul play. 6. Ando says Tizzano was over the ball before the collision and could not have been arriving simultaneously with Jack Morgan. 7. John says Joe Schmidt handled the press conference well by citing the law and pressing the officiating framework. 8. They say referee Andrea Piardi looked at the replay only a couple of times and may have rushed the decision. 9. The panel also notes that a similar replay-heavy review against Fiji lasted much longer despite having less consequence. 10. The discussion then moves to the Wallabies leading 23-5 before the Lions cut the gap to 23-17 at halftime. 11. John points to injuries to Alan Alatoa, James Slipper, Bobby Valentini, and Will Skelton as a major reason for the drop-off. 12. Ando argues the bench did not have enough abrasive ball carriers to replace the lost front-row and back-row power. 13. Both hosts say Harry Wilson is better as a support runner than as the first-man collision option. 14. They say the Wallabies relied too often on Wilson, Langi Gleeson, and Len Ikitau to generate momentum in the second half. 15. John says Will Skelton was dominant and changed every contact, despite Ronan O'Gara's pre-series comments. 16. Ando says Bobby Valentini forced multiple tacklers and created the front-foot ball the Wallabies needed. 17. The tone stays emotional and analytical, with the hosts repeatedly cross-checking law, selection, and match footage. 18. The format is a three-way rugby debate built around live frustration, replay detail, and selection arguments. 19. Best for Wallabies supporters and Lions-test viewers who want selection and refereeing analysis. 20. Less useful for listeners wanting a light recap or no deep rugby-law discussion.

As heard by us

A blunt post-match debrief that turns a painful Lions win into selection questions and tactical lessons.

The episode treats the Lions win over the Wallabies as something to pick apart, not just file away. It keeps the frustration in view, but it keeps circling back to the football: the 13 channel was targeted again and again, and the discussion keeps asking whether that job makes…

Read the full review in PlayNext →

Why you'd press play

You want the raw post-match read on a Wallabies loss that hurt.

Read the full recommendation in PlayNext →
Listen to the show on