Revisionist History · Pushkin Industries

Understanding the Death Penalty: Malcolm Gladwell on The Intercept Briefing

December 11, 2025·42 min·3 clips

Malcolm Gladwell explains how the death penalty is an impersonation of a medical act, not a real one.

The lens is institutional cruelty. The episode opens on a searing critique of America's death penalty, then moves from one case into the machinery that lets harm continue. The numbers are blunt. As of December 1st this year, 11 states had executed 44 people in 2025, making it one of the deadliest years for state-sanctioned killing. Alabama sits near the center of the conversation. The transcript points to nitrogen hypoxia there and names Kenny Smith's execution as the brutal precedent. Gladwell is joined by Liliana Segura, a criminal justice reporter at The Intercept, for a conversation about capital punishment and the law's failure to correct itself. The legal history matters. Segura goes back to 2008, when the Supreme Court examined Kentucky's three-drug protocol in Bates versus Reese. The warning signs were already there: botched executions, failed vein access, and evidence that people were suffering on the gurney. The Court upheld the protocol anyway. That did not settle the science. States soon changed lethal injection protocols because key drugs became unavailable. Sodium thiopental, the anesthetic used before later drugs produced noxious effects, became hard for states to get. States improvised. Some turned to midazolam, a sedative experts repeatedly said could not reliably anesthetize people for lethal injection. Then came Oklahoma. After the gruesome 2014 execution of Clayton Lockett, the dispute went back to the Supreme Court in Glossop versus Gross. The pattern is ugly and familiar: procedures fail, experts object, courts see the record, and the system still finds a way to keep killing.

As heard by us

A hard look at how capital punishment turns failure into procedure.

Malcolm Gladwell and Liliana Segura make capital punishment feel concrete, not abstract. The episode moves from lethal injection protocols and Supreme Court rulings to the messier question of what a legal system does when it keeps missing the damage in front of it.

Read the full review in PlayNext →

Why you'd press play

For when you want a clear-eyed case against cruelty in America that follows the evidence.

Read the full recommendation in PlayNext →

Listen to the show on

Apple Podcasts Spotify

Play clips from this episode More from Revisionist History