Are job interviews, invented by Thomas Edison in the 1920s, finally outdated and ineffective for modern hiring?
The episode begins with host Matt Alder questioning if job interviews are still effective. Guest Sarah Lamont introduces herself as running Montan Motion Consulting, providing fractional head of talent services. She outlines three major employer challenges: high talent volume post-layoffs, a persistent skills gap where 68% of European employers struggle to find skilled talent, and culture wars around hybrid work and performance management. Lamont identifies the interview process as the most glaringly unfit part of recruiting, noting it was invented by Thomas Edison a century ago and hasn't adapted to population growth, technology, neurodiversity awareness, or social movements. She explains outdated practices persist due to human comfort with routines, global scale making change difficult, and risk aversion. Lamont shares an example of a successful alternative: hiring a chef by paying him to work a dinner shift to assess technical skill, stress management, and communication. She advocates for a three-stage process: online skills-based application, a brief verification call, then paid on-site job tasks. The discussion addresses scaling this approach, suggesting large language models for initial sourcing and remote live task interviews for roles like engineering. Lamont emphasizes paying candidates for their time to avoid adding exploitative stages. She then analyzes generational impact, noting younger workers (Millennials, Gen Z) value flexibility, autonomy, work-life balance, and meaningful work, challenging norms like five-day office weeks. Lamont predicts a reckoning where employers must innovate, reduce menial tasks via AI, and improve sustainability accountability. She forecasts a future with more gig economy work, contracting, and freelance roles, less middle management, and continued pushes toward STEM and healthcare fields due to an aging workforce. The episode concludes with Lamont acknowledging uncertainty but expecting significant shifts away from traditional 9-5 structures.

As heard by us

A grounded case for replacing interview polish with paid work samples and clearer evidence of capability.

Sarah Lamont takes aim at the job interview and asks whether it still deserves its central place in hiring. Her proposed shift is practical: put less weight on polished CVs and cover letters, and give candidates focused, paid work that reflects the role.

Read the full review in PlayNext →

Why you'd press play

If interviews leave you guessing, press play for a sharper look at hiring that lets candidates show the work, not just talk around it.

Read the full recommendation in PlayNext →
Listen to the show on