Meinungsfreiheit unter der Brücke - von Nicolas Riedl

·12 min·1 clip

Why was journalist Hüseyin Doru placed on an EU sanctions list without evidence, stripping him of his basic rights?

The episode opens by stating that expressing one's opinion increasingly requires courage, citing surveys and introducing the case of journalist Hüseyin Doru as an example. Doru, a German-Turkish journalist, was added to an EU sanctions list in May 2025 by the Central Office for Sanctions Enforcement (ZFS). The alleged reason is that his pro-Palestinian reporting sows ethnic and religious discord and supports Russia's destabilizing activities, labeling him a 'disinformation actor' without providing evidence. Doru previously worked for the outlet Redfish, which is Russian-funded, but left after Russia's invasion of Ukraine because he could not support its politics. The sanctions have stripped him of civil rights, frozen his bank account, and made receiving or giving money or goods a punishable offense for anyone involved. He receives only 506 euros per month as a basic allowance. The situation escalated when his wife's account was also frozen in March, citing their close relationship as spouses living together with three children, which the narrator criticizes as a form of collective punishment. This has made paying rent impossible, threatening the family with poverty and homelessness. The episode questions the humanity of the bureaucrats behind these decisions, referencing Hannah Arendt's concept of the 'banality of evil.' It argues the EU bureaucracy has evolved from trivial regulations to a totalitarian character. The narrative highlights the immediate risk to the children's welfare, suggesting the precarious conditions might be intentionally created to justify removing the infants from their parents. It draws parallels to other scandals like Epstein and Helmut Kentler to warn of potential abuse in state care. The episode contends that this persecution occurs solely because Doru holds an opinion disapproved by Brussels. It criticizes the EU's hypocrisy, noting efforts to recruit soldiers to defend 'freedom' while punishing dissent. Doru's case is presented as symbolic of Europe's moral and political bankruptcy under what the narrator calls a 'para-democratic, cooperativist-fascistoid metastasis named the EU.' The episode concludes by stating the Doru case is a litmus test for belief in EU democratic ideals and warns that anyone could be next if they express an unpopular opinion. The text is by Nikolas Riedl, read by Camilla Hildebrandt, with closing remarks by host Eva Schmidt.

Listen to the show on

Apple Podcasts Spotify

Play clips from this episode More from Radio München