Gift als Heilmittel verkauft - Interview mit Pfizer Chef-Toxikologe Dr. Helmut Sterz

·33 min·2 clips

Sterz found that Pfizer and BioNTech failed to justify skipping required toxicology studies and tested their mRNA product on only one animal species instead of the mandated two.

1. Radio München presents an interview by Eva Schmidt with Dr. Helmut Sterz, former chief toxicologist at Pfizer and author of the book Die Impf-Mafia. 2. Sterz trained as a veterinarian, completed a doctoral fellowship at the Institute for Veterinary Virology in Giessen, and worked in pharmaceutical toxicology from 1984 (Boehringer Mannheim) through roles at Servier in Orléans, Hoffmann-La Roche in Basel, and finally as head of toxicological research at Pfizer's centre in Amboise, France until his retirement in 2008. 3. The episode's core thesis is that COVID-19 mRNA products were approved through deliberately truncated toxicological review under emergency legislation, that regulators and health ministers knowingly misrepresented the safety profile, and that criminal liability exists for identifiable individuals. 4. Sterz began writing critical papers for colleagues in 2020 about mask mandates and other non-pharmaceutical measures; his focus shifted to the vaccines after accessing early FDA approval documents in early 2021. 5. A US emergency framework established around 2005 in response to anthrax-related terrorism threats allowed pharmaceutical companies to perform significantly fewer safety studies during declared health emergencies; the US invoked this emergency in late January 2020, before the WHO declared a pandemic in March. 6. Sterz says the Pfizer-BioNTech dossier lacked justification for multiple omitted required studies — a regulatory baseline obligation — and used only rats in reproductive toxicology trials rather than the required two animal species. 7. He argues that a second animal species in reproductive toxicology studies would likely have predicted adverse effects later observed in humans, a failure he describes as inexcusable for a product given to hundreds of millions of healthy people. 8. Sterz distinguishes appropriate abbreviated testing for terminal cancer patients — who consent to higher risk to access experimental treatment — from what he considers unjustifiable shortcuts for a product treating an illness he describes as comparable in severity to moderate influenza in healthy individuals. 9. He notes that Pfizer's pivotal trial did not measure whether the injection reduced overall mortality, only whether it reduced symptomatic illness meeting a certain threshold, and that the trial enrolled insufficient numbers of elderly subjects to make claims about protecting high-risk groups. 10. The PREP Act and equivalent European emergency legislation, along with the EU-Pfizer purchase contract, include liability waivers for manufacturers, regulators, and physicians — but Sterz argues this protection is voided if intentional misconduct can be demonstrated. 11. He identifies health ministers as particularly liable because they publicly stated the products were safe and without side effects, which he says they knew to be false based on available data. 12. Sterz expresses concern that judges who penalised dissenting physicians during 2020–2021 remain on the bench and may be too conflicted to adjudicate vaccine-injury cases impartially. 13. He defines the 'Impfmafia' (vaccine mafia) as any institutions or individuals earning large sums from vaccinations, naming the WHO, UN, Gates Foundation, GAVI, pharmaceutical companies, BlackRock, the Rockefeller organisation, and the World Economic Forum. 14. He claims the WHO's agenda is substantially funded and shaped by Bill Gates, and that governments, media, universities, and physicians are financially sponsored by the pharmaceutical industry, creating a system he describes with the German idiom 'wes Brot ich ess, des Lied ich sing' (whose bread I eat, whose song I sing). 15. Sterz states he estimates deaths attributable to the injections are in the 'double-digit millions' globally, and that this figure exceeds the number of lives saved by vaccination — a claim he says justifies the term 'mafia'. 16. He says he has not personally faced threats or retaliation from Pfizer or BioNTech, attributing this partly to his age (nearly 80 at recording) and his assessment that he is too minor a figure to target. 17. Sterz calls the childhood vaccination schedule — which he says can involve six to ten vaccines administered from birth — a profitable business model that he says has more to do with revenue than health. 18. The episode is conducted as a one-on-one interview; the tone is adversarial toward pharmaceutical companies and public health institutions, with Sterz presenting his claims as factual conclusions from insider access to industry documents. 19. This episode is best suited for German-speaking listeners interested in pharmaceutical regulation, COVID-19 policy criticism, or vaccine-safety debates from a claimed industry-insider perspective. 20. Listeners who accept mainstream public health positions on mRNA vaccine safety, or who require peer-reviewed evidence for factual claims, will find the episode's assertions unsupported and potentially objectionable.

Listen to the show on

Apple Podcasts Spotify

Play clips from this episode More from Radio München