Premium Ad-Free: Straight White American Jesus · Bradley Onishi + Daniel Miller

It's in the Code ep 187: “It’s Important Work—As Long As Someone Else Does It”

April 8, 2026·30 min·2 clips

Josh Hawley claims blue-collar work makes men free, but it actually enslaves them to economic elites.

1. 'Straight White American Jesus' episode 187 concludes the podcast's analysis of Chapter 8 of Senator Josh Hawley's book 'Manhood,' focused on the role of 'Man as Builder.' 2. Host Daniel Miller is the sole speaker, drawing on his background in religious studies and cultural criticism to analyze Hawley's ideology. 3. The episode's thesis is that Hawley's promotion of blue-collar masculine labor is an elite ideology masquerading as a populist vision for working men. 4. Miller explains that Hawley's chapter argues men derive meaning, social value, and masculine identity specifically from blue-collar or manual labor that produces tangible goods. 5. Hawley, Miller notes, mocks men who refuse work because it's 'not fulfilling enough' or who want work-life balance, and implies men should take any job offered regardless of pay or hours. 6. Miller introduces the concept of 'homo economicus,' attributed to a scholar he admires, to describe how Hawley's ideology reduces human worth to productive economic output. 7. Miller charges that Hawley engages in 'biblical laundering' — feeding neoliberal capitalist ideology into scripture and presenting it back as divine mandate rather than political theory. 8. The episode's central takedown quotes Hawley's own line: 'you can't be free if someone else controls your livelihood,' then demonstrates that most blue-collar wage earners do not control their livelihoods. 9. Miller argues that the people who are actually 'free' under Hawley's definition are managers, factory owners, and boards of directors — not the workers Hawley holds up as masculine exemplars. 10. Miller contends that Republican economic policy — which Hawley supports — has gutted blue-collar America through opposition to organized labor, collective bargaining, and a living wage. 11. The gig economy is cited as a specific example: workers denied employee status are told their precarious multi-job arrangement represents 'work freedom' or 'work flexibility.' 12. Miller notes the irony that a senator calling on men to work any available hours cannot reconcile this with Hawley's earlier chapters praising men for being good fathers and husbands — 80-hour work weeks preclude family time. 13. The second major point is Hawley's personal hypocrisy: he is a Yale-educated lawyer, attorney general, and senator who has never done blue-collar work and relies on stories of his grandfather's JCPenney and café jobs because he has no such stories himself. 14. Miller extends the critique to the broader MAGA movement — led by a president 'who has never done a day's work in his life' and an 'oligarchic cabinet full of billionaires who've made their fortunes on the backs of others.' 15. Miller asks listeners to consider whether GOP politicians direct their own children into any available blue-collar work — and answers his own question: their children get degrees from 'those fancy colleges' and sit on boards. 16. The episode frames this as a structural feature of right-wing ideology: a vision of society 'governed by economic elites, served by an economy that benefits them through the exploitation of people who actually work for a living.' 17. The format is a solo analytical monologue with no guests; Miller is direct, sometimes sarcastic, and addresses listeners as though continuing a long-running conversation. 18. The tone is pointed but systematic — Miller builds the argument step by step, often pre-empting counterarguments before dismissing them. 19. Listeners interested in critiques of conservative masculinity ideology, political economy, and the religious framing of right-wing politics will find this episode substantive. 20. Listeners who support Hawley's politics or prefer neutral-tone analysis without pointed criticism would likely find the host's framing and tone off-putting.

As heard by us

A hard-edged rebuttal to manhood rhetoric that ignores who sets the terms of work.

This review treats Chapter 8 of Josh Hawley's Manhood as a labor argument first and a culture-war provocation second. It takes Hawley seriously enough to name his claim about men and certain kinds of work, then turns around and refuses the easy romance around blue-collar labor.

Read the full review in PlayNext →

Why you'd press play

If Hawley's manhood sermon already sounds suspect, this episode shows why.

Read the full recommendation in PlayNext →

Listen to the show on

Apple Podcasts Spotify

Play clips from this episode More from Premium Ad-Free: Straight White American Jesus