The philosophy of fun | Myriam François, Freya India, James Tartaglia

·51 min·4 clips

James Tartaglia reveals why materialism leaves no room for fun and why we need a philosophy centered on experience.

1. Philosophy for Our Times presents a live panel debate titled 'The philosophy of fun,' featuring philosopher James Tartaglia, journalist Myriam François, and writer Freya India. 2. Tartaglia is a professor of philosophy and jazz saxophonist who defends metaphysical idealism; François is a broadcaster and documentary filmmaker who founded MPWR Productions; India is a freelance writer whose newsletter Girls focuses on Gen Z issues and is affiliated with Jonathan Haidt's Anxious Generation project. 3. The panel addresses whether fun should be seen as an essential rather than a superficial addition to life, set against evidence that Gen Z is having less sex, taking fewer drugs, and spending more time on phones than prior generations. 4. Tartaglia opens by citing Plato's final work, The Laws, in which Plato writes that 'men and women alike must fall in with our role and spend life in making our play as perfect as possible,' arguing that Plato considered business trivial and play serious. 5. Tartaglia adds the detail — newly confirmed via AI decipherment of the Herculaneum scrolls — that on the last day of his life, Plato hired a flute player and was irritated by her poor performance, evidence that he took play profoundly seriously. 6. Tartaglia argues that the dominant philosophy of materialism has no room for experience or fun, and that replacing it with idealism — placing experience at the centre of reality — would allow society to pursue what Plato recommended. 7. François draws a sharp distinction between 'fun,' which she defines as the distraction capitalism offers to prevent people confronting their complicity in unjust structures, and 'joy,' which she characterises using Cornel West's formulation as a byproduct of a life lived in service to others. 8. François grounds the distinction in a personal account of attending a celebration for a Gazan filmmaker friend who had won a major award but had lost 61 family members, arguing that conventional celebration felt grotesque in that context. 9. India reframes the panel's concern: she is not worried about declining drug and alcohol use but about a broader risk-aversion trend — Gen Z is delaying moving out, delaying learning to drive, and, she cites, 90% report avoiding phone calls entirely. 10. India calls the core issue not a lack of fun but 'a fear of living,' arguing that extreme social anxiety and avoidance of unplanned encounters is the central driver of the mental health crisis among young people. 11. Tartaglia argues that human beings are inherently goal-directed and that technology is misusing this by supplying fake, pointless goals — compulsive scrolling for likes, game-grinding — rather than meaningful ones. 12. François pushes back on individualising the problem, arguing that a generation unable to afford housing, facing the highest inequality in recorded history — citing an Oxfam figure that 1% of UK residents own more than 70% of the population — cannot be expected to prioritise fun. 13. India counters that some of the most severe mental health deterioration she has observed is among wealthy, affluent young people, citing a 2021 statistic that 57% of girls reported feeling persistently hopeless and sad and 36% of American young people reported having no meaning in their lives. 14. Tartaglia introduces the philosophical 'problem of other minds' to explain the deeper damage of virtual environments: in a video game or virtual reality context, one genuinely cannot determine whether another participant is human or AI. 15. He argues that as AI improves, current technology is structurally producing 'solipsism machines' — devices that replicate the philosophical position that only the self exists — and calls for technology to be redirected toward intersubjective connection. 16. François notes that Mark Zuckerberg's original conception of Facebook was a platform for rating women's looks at Harvard, arguing this origin reveals the exploitative rather than connective intent of dominant social media platforms. 17. India argues that social media platforms have turned children into self-advertising products: 14- and 15-year-olds have grown up being ranked and reviewed by peers online, with their self-worth becoming indistinguishable from their market worth. 18. The panel's tone is a structured live debate with academic rigour from Tartaglia, politically charged interventions from François, and data-grounded personal testimony from India; the format allows direct exchanges between the three positions. 19. This episode is best suited to listeners interested in philosophy of mind, Gen Z social psychology, political economy, and the ethics of technology. 20. Listeners seeking practical self-help or concrete advice on improving their social lives will likely find the level of abstraction and political framing unsatisfying.

As heard by us

A sharp, grounded argument about fun, purpose, and modern life.

This episode treats fun as a real question rather than a throwaway mood, asking whether people still know how to enjoy themselves and whether purpose should come first.

Read the full review in PlayNext →

Why you'd press play

Press play if you want a real argument about fun, phones, and meaning.

Read the full recommendation in PlayNext →

Listen to the show on

Apple Podcasts Spotify

Play clips from this episode More from Philosophy For Our Times