The Social Media Addiction Trials Begin

February 14, 2026·51 min·3 clips

Internal Meta messages show employees calling themselves 'pushers' and worrying they caused 'reward deficit disorder' in users.

The trial starts as a design question. In a Los Angeles courtroom, Meta and Google are accused of making Instagram and YouTube harmful to children by keeping their attention for as long as possible. Infinite scroll is not treated as a harmless convenience here. It is one of the design choices that may finally face limits. Brooke Gladstone keeps the setup lean and lets the argument breathe: habit, addiction, harm, and the much less glamorous question of what would actually help people stop reaching for the phone. Julia Angwin gives the episode its sharpest personal test. She says that switching her phone to grayscale cut her screen time from more than eight hours a day to four, and that the change lasted four or five months. The embarrassment in that story matters. It keeps the segment from turning into a tidy self-help win. It sounds more like someone noticing, with some discomfort, how much color and interface pleasure can steer a hand before the mind catches up. Withdrawal is where the episode gets careful. Anderson points to withdrawal as one sign of addiction, but Angwin says she felt relief instead. That small distinction keeps the show from slapping the same diagnosis on every heavy habit. Then the scope widens. Australian research following more than 100,000 Australian adolescents across three years enters as a way to ask whether social media is harmful even if the addiction label is still slippery. Regulation brings its own mess. Child-safety rules can push adults toward a more document-heavy internet, where ordinary access may depend on identification. The last turn is civic: Judd Legum argues that turning news into a game pulls attention away from citizenship. The episode keeps circling one uncomfortable question: who gains when attention is easy to capture and hard to govern?

As heard by us

A sharp look at social media harm, online safety rules, and the betting-style gamification of civic news.

On the Media uses the Los Angeles trial against Meta and Google to ask a harder question than the courtroom alone can answer: when platforms are accused of hooking children, where do design choices end and addiction begin?

Read the full review in PlayNext →

Why you'd press play

You want the social-media case behind the compulsion problem, not a slogan.

Read the full recommendation in PlayNext →

Listen to the show on

Apple Podcasts Spotify

Play clips from this episode More from On the Media