Old Ass Movie Reviews Podcast · oldassmoviereviews

OAMR: Wes Cravens New Nightmare

·48 min·3 clips

Wes Craven writes a movie to trap Freddy Krueger back in fiction.

1. Old Ass Movie Reviews covers Wes Craven’s New Nightmare and treats it as the final original Nightmare on Elm Street film. 2. Scott and Dave host the episode, and their horror-movie back-and-forth matters because they compare this film directly to the original Nightmare on Elm Street. 3. The episode is asking what happens when Wes Craven, Heather Langenkamp, Robert Englund, and John Saxon play themselves inside a Freddy story. 4. Scott says the 1984 Nightmare on Elm Street is “one of the scariest movies” he has seen, and Dave agrees. 5. Both hosts point to the movie’s reality setup, where the cast plays themselves and nightmare material starts blending into everyday life. 6. Scott says the film is “a very different movie” because it takes place in reality, or “Maybe.” 7. Dave explains the premise as Wes Craven creating a new script so Freddy can be trapped again. 8. Scott says Freddy in this version is “darker,” “more demonic,” and “more evil” than the version people expect. 9. Dave argues that the trailer was misleading because it suggested more filming-within-the-film and more Robert Englund possession material than the movie actually delivered. 10. Scott says he enjoyed the movie more after thinking about it, even though he still thinks some scenes and kills feel off. 11. The hosts identify the key twist that the movie is layering three realities: the movie, the demonic realm, and Heather Langenkamp’s lived reality. 12. Scott says the house scene with John Saxon calling Heather “Nancy” was the clearest sign that the film was shifting layers. 13. Dave says John Saxon had a strong presence, and Scott says he does “not love John Saxon” but liked seeing him show up. 14. Scott says Robert Englund did not get a big enough role as Robert Englund, and Dave agrees that the movie could have pushed that angle further. 15. The hosts both say the original Freddy was scarier, while this version feels closer to a cartoon or fairy-tale figure. 16. Scott mentions the furnace material involving Dylan and says he could tell where that part was headed as soon as he saw the furnace. 17. The tone is conversational, reactive, and full of side comments about trailers, editing, and franchise memories. 18. The format stays loose and personal, with both hosts interrupting their own points to compare scenes, remember theater experiences, and debate what counts as dream logic. 19. Listeners who like Freddy Krueger lore, meta horror, and 1990s franchise talk will get the most out of this episode. 20. Listeners wanting a tight plot recap or a spoiler-light overview may skip it.

As heard by us

A meta Freddy discussion that keeps returning to why the first Nightmare still hits hard.

Scott and Dave spend most of the discussion doing what they do best: reacting as scenes unfold, pausing when something lands, and following the movie's stranger turns without forcing a tidy summary.

Read the full review in PlayNext →

Why you'd press play

If you want a Freddy sequel that gets weird, self-aware, and genuinely fun, press play.

Read the full recommendation in PlayNext →

Listen to the show on

Apple Podcasts Spotify

Play clips from this episode More from Old Ass Movie Reviews Podcast