Crystal Simone Smith, "Common Sense (1776), Addressed to Today's Citizen's of America: An Erasure" (Beacon, 2026)

March 25, 2026·54 min·5 clips

Smith confronts the refusal to amend language that contradicts America's founding creed.

This episode features poet Crystal Simone Smith discussing her book "Common Sense (1776), Address," a poetic reinterpretation of Thomas Paine's foundational pamphlet. The conversation is hosted by Lee Pierce, who specializes in rhetoric and communication. Smith's work directly confronts the historical contradictions within America's founding documents and ideals. Smith explains her book is a response to the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence and the ongoing national struggle with its inherent omissions. She specifically engages with Thomas Paine's "Common Sense," a document she describes as revered yet flawed in its framing. The poet's project involves erasure and re-composition, using Paine's original text as a source material to create new meaning. She aims to amend the historical language to better reflect an egalitarian creed. Smith reads several poems from the collection, including one that reworks Paine's famous opening line about the distinction between society and government. Another poem she shares interrogates the concept of "common sense" itself and who it historically included or excluded. The discussion references the philosophical underpinnings of the American founding, including the natural rights theories of John Locke. Smith's method involves a meticulous, line-by-line poetic dialogue with the 18th-century source text. A key insight is that Smith sees poetic form as a powerful tool for historical critique and amendment, more potent than prose argument. She argues that the refusal to amend foundational language perpetuates historical harm and limits national self-understanding. Her work reveals how the exalted language of founding documents can simultaneously inspire and obscure. The process of erasure poetry forces a confrontation with the original text's silences, particularly regarding race and personhood. Smith contends that contemporary writers have a moral obligation to engage with and transform this problematic heritage. The conversation suggests that poetry can perform a kind of reparative justice on historical texts. The tone is intellectual, reflective, and deeply engaged with literary and historical analysis. The style is a structured interview, moving between conceptual discussion and recitation of poetry. Listeners interested in contemporary poetry, American studies, and critical approaches to foundational national texts would find this episode compelling. Those seeking light entertainment or unrelated historical narrative might choose to skip it.

Listen to the show on

Apple Podcasts Spotify

Play clips from this episode More from New Books Network