New Books in Latino Studies · Marshall Poe

Tiffany D. Joseph, "Not All In: Race, Immigration, and Health Care Exclusion in the Age of Obamacare" (Johns Hopkins UP, 2025)

April 2, 2025·1 hr 6 min·5 clips

Brazilian immigrants returned home because they believed they'd have better healthcare access in Brazil than in the U.S.

1. New Books in Latino Studies features Professor Tiffany D. Joseph discussing her book "Not All In: Race, Immigration, and Healthcare Exclusion in the Age of Obamacare," published by Johns Hopkins University Press. 2. Joseph is an Associate Professor of Sociology and International Affairs at Northeastern University, whose research spans race, migration, and healthcare access across the U.S. and Brazil. 3. The episode's core thesis is that landmark U.S. health reforms — the Massachusetts Health Reform of 2006 and the ACA of 2010 — failed to deliver coverage to Latin American immigrants in Greater Boston due to layered structural barriers. 4. The research originated in Joseph's dissertation fieldwork in Minas Gerais, Brazil, where Brazilian return migrants repeatedly raised U.S. healthcare inaccessibility without prompting, despite the study's focus on racial identity. 5. Some interviewees in Minas Gerais reported returning to Brazil specifically because they believed Brazilian healthcare would be more accessible than the U.S. system — even for people who had built lives in America. 6. Joseph conducted her Greater Boston study across multiple waves from 2011 to 2019, interviewing over 200 participants divided among immigrants, healthcare providers, and staff at immigrant and health advocacy organizations. 7. The three immigrant communities studied — Brazilians, Dominicans, and Salvadorans — were chosen because they represent distinct racial phenotypes, income backgrounds, and documentation statuses that allowed comparative analysis. 8. Brazilians in the study typically arrived on tourist visas that lapsed, were racialized as white, and came from middle-class backgrounds in Brazil; Dominicans were more often racialized as Black and held legal permanent residency; Salvadorans occupied an intermediate position and many held Temporary Protected Status. 9. The most surprising finding was that both the Massachusetts and federal reforms actually reduced effective access for these groups, because documentation eligibility restrictions, English-only materials, and enforcement fears combined to block the coverage they were nominally eligible for. 10. Joseph describes incidents where immigrants cancelled medical appointments the day after ICE raids in their neighborhoods, and others who were pulled over by police en route to appointments and feared immigration detention. 11. The book profiles a Dominican woman named Victoria, who praised Massachusetts as a world-class healthcare destination in the same interview in which she described a provider disbelieving her mental health symptoms, removing her medication, and triggering a crisis. 12. Joseph argues for replacing the undocumented/documented binary with a citizen/non-citizen binary, noting that anyone short of U.S. citizenship remains legally deportable — a vulnerability she began documenting in 2019 under the first Trump administration and which has since expanded to green card holders. 13. She found that Brazilians racialized as white more often attributed discrimination to their immigrant status rather than race, while Dominicans and Salvadorans more frequently described compounding racial and immigrant discrimination. 14. Language emerged as a distinct barrier: limited English proficiency prevented immigrants from navigating enrollment processes and communicating with providers, and Joseph notes that Trump's executive order designating English as the official U.S. language intensifies that vulnerability. 15. On the ACA's misconceptions, Joseph cites the 2009 congressional moment when Representative Joe Wilson shouted "you lie" at Obama over undocumented immigrant coverage, and uses it to illustrate widespread misunderstanding — in reality, the ACA excludes most undocumented immigrants from all coverage options. 16. She notes that undocumented immigrants are barred from purchasing coverage in the ACA exchanges even with their own money, removing a revenue contribution that would otherwise stabilize the insurance pool. 17. The interview format is measured and academic, with host Deidre Tyler-Hose posing prepared questions and Joseph responding with extended, methodically structured answers that cite specific data, policy provisions, and individual case stories. 18. Joseph's tone is cautious but pointed, consistently connecting her research findings to the policy debates unfolding in 2025, including proposed Medicaid cuts and expiring ACA subsidies. 19. Researchers, policy students, healthcare advocates, and anyone tracking U.S. immigration and health policy will find this episode substantive and data-grounded. 20. Listeners seeking short narrative content or entertainment rather than academic policy analysis may find the pace slow.

As heard by us

A patient, policy-minded interview that connects health care exclusion to immigration, language, and lived experience.

Tiffany D. Joseph's conversation makes a straightforward policy case: for many immigrants in the U.S., documented and undocumented, access to health coverage and other public benefits has long been restricted by federal rules, not by the idea that the Affordable Care Act draws…

Read the full review in PlayNext →

Why you'd press play

Hear how ACA myths meet the reality of immigrant health coverage exclusions.

Read the full recommendation in PlayNext →

Listen to the show on

Apple Podcasts Spotify

Play clips from this episode More from New Books in Latino Studies