New Books in Indian Religions · Marshall Poe

Ghazala Wahab, "The Hindi Heartland: A Study" (Aleph Book Company, 2025)

·1 hr 37 min·5 clips

The British separated Hindustani into Hindi and Urdu to divide communities, creating the slogan 'Hindi, Hindu, Hindustan'.

This episode of *New Books in Indian Religions* features an interview with Ghazala Wahab, editor of *Force* magazine and author of "Born a Muslim," discussing her new book "The Hindi Heartland: A Study." The host, from the show *Swapuk Twice Toiled*, engages Wahab in a detailed conversation about the region's social and political evolution. Wahab explains her investigative focus shifted from Islamic radicalization in her previous work to understanding the roots of Hindu radicalization in the Hindi belt. Her research identifies the pre-Partition violence in Bihar in 1946 as a critical, under-taught historical event where Gandhi blamed the Congress for "beastly" behavior and noted Muslim deaths were ten times higher than in Bengal's Noakhali. Wahab structures her book to trace history from the Delhi Sultanate through the Mughals to post-independence politics, examining how history was used as a tool for polarization. She argues the region's relative communal quiet until the 1980s was notable, with police like the Provincial Armed Constabulary often being the primary agents of killing in Uttar Pradesh riots, not mobs. A key insight traces contemporary polarization to the 19th-century British decision to split Hindustani into two languages: Urdu (with Persian/Arabic script) and Hindi (with Devanagari script). This division, championed by figures like Sir Syed Ahmed Khan and Bhartendu Harishchandra, was intensely linked to competition for scarce government jobs. Wahab notes the British actively fostered this Hindu-Muslim division post-1857, fearing unified rebellions like the Non-Cooperation and Quit India movements. She describes the Hindi heartland's flat geography and historical empires as fostering linguistic intelligibility among dialects like Braj, Awadhi, and Bhojpuri. Wahab challenges the stereotype that casteism and patriarchy are uniquely severe in the Hindi belt, attributing this perception to Bollywood's cultural focus on the region. She details how Bihar's post-Mandal politics led to Uttarakhand's creation by upper castes, while Jharkhand's movement was a long-standing tribal demand. The carving of Jharkhand from Bihar left a residual state with poor human capital, where northern flood-prone areas created migrant labor and southern fertile zones entrenched Bhumihar landlord tyranny and caste-class fusion. In contrast, Uttar Pradesh's implemented land reforms empowered Dalit communities like the Jatavs with land ownership, mitigating large-scale caste violence. The tone is deeply conversational and educational, flowing from the host's questions into Wahab's extensive, researched explanations. Listeners interested in modern Indian history, sociology, and the political mechanics of language, caste, and regionalism will find this episode richly detailed. Those seeking a light narrative or current-event debate might find the academic and historical depth less engaging.

As heard by us

A clear map of caste, floods, and state-making in north India.

Ghazala Wahab's conversation treats north Indian politics as a matter of geography, caste, and state power, not a tidy headline. It traces the making of Jharkhand and Chhattisgarh, then stays with Bihar's flood-prone rivers and the migration and underdevelopment they helped…

Read the full review in PlayNext →

Why you'd press play

If you want Bihar, Jharkhand, and Chhattisgarh unpacked through floods, caste, and state lines.

Read the full recommendation in PlayNext →

Listen to the show on

Apple Podcasts Spotify

Play clips from this episode More from New Books in Indian Religions