Netflix vs Cinema · Toes In Video Production Podcasts

303. Marty Supreme Vs The Abandons; Anaconda VS Pluribus; Song Sung Blue VS The Tank

·55 min·5 clips

Sean reveals why Timothee Chalamet's obsessive table tennis champion in Marty Supreme is a surprisingly sympathetic character.

This episode of Netflix vs Cinema features hosts Tosin, Sean, and Sharon comparing recent cinema and streaming releases to determine which platform is "winning." Sean is a self-described 70s expert who values logical plots, while Sharon is a book adaptation enthusiast who generally avoids animated content. The panel reviews three cinema releases: Sean awards "Marty Supreme," starring Timothée Chalamet as a relentless 1950s table tennis player, a high 4.6 out of 5 for its realistic and relentless storytelling. Sharon gives the Western series "The Abandons" on Netflix, featuring Gillian Anderson and Lena Headey as rival matriarchs in a silver mining conflict, a solid 3 stars, noting some character reactions feel contrived. The group debates the meta-horror comedy "Anaconda," a reboot where characters played by Paul Rudd and Jack Black are hunted by a real snake while filming a remake, with Sean enjoying its un-serious tone and awarding a 3, while Tosin finds its central joke overextended and gives it a 2. For streaming, Sharon highly recommends the Apple TV+ series "Pluribus," awarding it 4.5 stars for its premise of a global hive-mind virus and the journey of an immune survivor played by Rhea Seehorn. Sean describes watching the documentary "Future Shock" about the 2000 AD comic and the film "The Tank" on Amazon, which he compares to a bargain-basement version of "Fury." Tosin mentions starting the second season of "Fallout" but not fully engaging with it yet. A memorable moment is Sean's specific critique of an improvised scene in "Anaconda" involving urination, which he feels doesn't fit the film's flow. Sharon highlights the dark humor in "Pluribus," such as one immune survivor using the hive-mind to assemble a harem of supermodels. The stats analysis from a listener named Dave Beaton, which validated some of the hosts' informal theories about their reviewing patterns, is mentioned as a significant behind-the-scenes insight. The tone is conversational and opinionated, with hosts freely debating ratings and critiquing films based on personal enjoyment and narrative logic. The style is informal and review-focused, structured as a direct comparison between theatrical and at-home viewing experiences. Fans of straightforward film and TV reviews that blend personal anecdote with critical analysis would enjoy this episode. Listeners seeking in-depth, technical film criticism or those opposed to spoiler-free but plot-detailed discussions might prefer to skip.

As heard by us

A brisk, bantering screen-culture chat that makes the cinema-versus-streaming debate feel alive again.

This episode takes the old cinema-versus-streaming debate and keeps it moving without getting stiff. Tosin drives the pace, Sean Harris plays the logic cop, and Sharon brings the book-first, animation-skeptical angle that gives the discussion some pushback.

Read the full review in PlayNext →

Why you'd press play

Press play if you want a lively scoreboard for big screen versus sofa watches.

Read the full recommendation in PlayNext →

Listen to the show on

Apple Podcasts Spotify

Play clips from this episode More from Netflix vs Cinema