Mutiny Investing Podcast · Jason Buck

55. Mutiny Funds - The Defense Strategy

·49 min·3 clips
A river can average two feet deep and still drown you if the deep channel is in the wrong place.
1. Mutiny Investing Podcast episode 55, “Mutiny Funds - The Defense Strategy,” centers on sequence risk, 60-40 portfolios, and Mutiny’s defense framework. 2. The speakers include an unnamed Mutiny host, a co-host who says he has been introduced to trend following, and references to Harry Brown, Corey Hofstein, Howard Marks, and Jason Zweig. 3. The episode asks what a modern defense sleeve should do when stocks and bonds are both vulnerable. 4. A Taleb-style river example shows how a river that is “two feet deep on average” can still be dangerous because of a deep channel. 5. The same logic is applied to the Dow Jones Industrial Average from 1966 to 1997, where an 8% average annual return hid a long flat stretch and a later high-return stretch. 6. A retiring couple with $3 million is used to show how the return order can determine whether withdrawals lead to depletion or preservation. 7. A second example uses a 31-year-old saving $1,000 per month to show that ending wealth can differ sharply even when the average return is the same. 8. The speakers say a low-return period early in a career can be much harder than a low-return period later, when savings are larger and compounding matters more. 9. Corey Hofstein’s phrase “rebalance timing luck” is used to describe how birth timing and market timing shape outcomes. 10. The discussion says 60-40 was basically flat in real terms from 1968 to 1987, and down about 45% from peak. 11. Howard Marks is mentioned as one of the few money managers with live experience from the 1970s era of weak markets. 12. Jason Zweig’s snake analogy is used to contrast reading about drawdowns with actually living through them. 13. Harry Brown’s permanent portfolio is described as equal parts stocks, bonds, gold, and cash. 14. The speakers frame stocks and bonds as offensive assets and cash, gold, and alternatives as defensive tools. 15. Their modern version replaces cash with long volatility and tail risk, and gold with commodity trend following. 16. Trend following is described as buying what rises and shorting what falls across many commodity markets, financials, and FX markets. 17. The speakers say trend following is counterintuitive because it can mean buying high and selling higher, or selling low and buying lower. 18. The long-volatility sleeve is built from tail-risk options, opportunistic long optionality, relative-value volatility spreads, and intraday trend following. 19. People who like portfolio construction, managed futures, or crisis hedging would likely want this episode. 20. People looking for stock-picking tips or quick trade ideas would probably skip it.

As heard by us

A blunt look at trend following, whipsaw, and why diversification still has a price.

The discussion makes a solid case for trend following because it is useful precisely where it is messy: it can diversify a portfolio, but it also brings whipsaw and slower drawdowns that never feel tidy in the moment.

Read the full review in PlayNext →

Why you'd press play

You want the case for trend following without the fund-marketing gloss.

Read the full recommendation in PlayNext →
Listen to the show on