Madlik Podcast – Disruptive Torah Thoughts on Judaism · Geoffrey Stern

Thank God for the Rebellious Son

·34 min·3 clips

The Talmud says the rebellious son law never happened—so why is it in the Torah at all?

This episode of the Madlik Podcast, hosted by Rabbi Jeffrey Stern and Rabbi Adam Mintz, explores the Torah's concept of commandments that are meant to be studied rather than practiced. They analyze the biblical law of the "Ben Soreh U'Moreh," or rebellious son, who is to be stoned to death. The Talmud in Sanhedrin 71a states this law has never and will never be applied, existing instead for study and intellectual reward. The hosts extend this idea to other laws, like the idolatrous city and the leprous house, which the Talmud similarly labels as theoretical. They reference Maimonides' "Sefer HaMitzvot," where he categorizes commandments and finds only 60 "definite" positive commandments applicable to every Jewish man in all circumstances. Rabbi Stern introduces Rabbi Joseph B. Soloveitchik's concept from "Halakhic Man," arguing that Jewish philosophy's essence is found within halakha, or Jewish law, itself. The discussion contrasts this with the more narrative-driven approach of Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel, described by some as the "Aggadic man." The episode concludes with a reading from Chaim Nachman Bialik's essay "Halakha and Aggadah," where the poet frames halakha and aggadah as two inseparable halves of a whole. Bialik compares the legal work of crafting Shabbat to artists building a cathedral, where meticulous halakhic analysis ultimately creates a day of spiritual legend. The hosts present this as a key insight: many commandments serve as a cultural language to be listened to and interpreted, not just observed. The tone is conversational and educational, blending traditional text study with broader philosophical inquiry. Listeners interested in Jewish law, theology, and literary interpretations of religious texts will find this episode engaging. Those seeking purely narrative storytelling or contemporary political commentary might find the analytical, text-focused discussion less appealing.

As heard by us

Halacha is framed as a cultural language, with Shabbat as the shared ideal it gathers around.

The conversation treats mitzvot as a cultural language, something to listen for as much as to observe. Jeffrey Stern and Rabbi Adam Mintz move from mitzvot to corporal punishment to Maimonides, using halacha to ask what these laws are doing beneath the surface of observance.

Read the full review in PlayNext →

Why you'd press play

A live Shabbat argument about mitzvot as a cultural language, not just commands.

Read the full recommendation in PlayNext →

Listen to the show on

Apple Podcasts Spotify

Play clips from this episode More from Madlik Podcast – Disruptive Torah Thoughts on Judaism