Letters from Sing Sing · NBC News Studios

Peer Pressure

March 6, 2023·37 min·2 clips

Barry Scheck says J.J.’s case began with an eyewitness making a selection from “hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of mugshots.”

The case begins with a killing at an illegal numbers parlor in Harlem at the end of January 1998. A retired police officer ran the place, and when two men came in to rob it and the officer was shot, the episode treats the investigation like the kind of heater case that pulls in attention and leaves little room for caution. That pressure matters. Barry says cases like this can push officers to move fast, because a retired officer's death brings a huge presence and a strong focus on solving the case. The episode keeps coming back to that rush. It suggests that speed can crowd out the slower work that protects accuracy. J.J. enters the story through an eyewitness. One man who fled after the murder was found two days later on the street selling heroin, and police brought him in with ten bags of heroin in his underwear before setting him in front of more than 230 pages of mugshots. The incentive is plain. He had every reason to help police, and the episode treats that setup as a textbook example of how identification evidence can go wrong when the witness is under pressure. Barry calls it trawling. He argues that looking through hundreds of mugshots is dangerous because it raises the chance that someone will make a choice to secure a deal rather than identify the right person. Ramon Aviles supplies the jury-side memory. Speaking years later, he recalls being juror number six and remembering the moment when Dorothy Kennedy, an 84-year-old witness, pointed toward the jury box and seemed to identify him as the gunman. The room changed after that. He says the jurors looked at one another, and the identification made it hard to see how anyone could vote guilty without doubting what they had just seen. Vanessa's testimony also weighs on the case. Some jurors did not believe J.J.'s girlfriend when she said he had been at home talking with his mother the morning of the murder, and that disbelief spread to J.J. and his mother too. The episode closes on interrogation. J.J. says the problem was there from the start: a three-hour interrogation, no interest in the truth, and a demand to get someone on the line, even if it meant calling on a Sunday.

As heard by us

A measured wrongful-conviction story about how pressure can harden uncertainty into a verdict.

It tracks the Harlem murder case with a clear eye for how a heater-case response, a strange identification, and a witness with an obvious incentive to cooperate can all widen the doubt around J.J.'s conviction.

Read the full review in PlayNext →

Why you'd press play

You want to hear how a murder case can get pushed toward a verdict under pressure.

Read the full recommendation in PlayNext →

Listen to the show on

Apple Podcasts Spotify

Play clips from this episode More from Letters from Sing Sing