Law360's Pro Say - News & Analysis on Law and the Legal Industry · Law360 - Legal News & Analysis

At Trial, SBF Was His Own Worst Enemy

·35 min·2 clips

Players argue televised college sports should pay them because “if we, the athletes, weren’t out there, no one would watch.”

1. Law360's Pro Say centers on NCAA NIL litigation, Supreme Court gun arguments, and the Sam Bankman-Fried fraud trial. 2. Host Amber McKinney leads with co-hosts Alex Lawson and Haley Knopf, and reporter Rachel Scharf joins to discuss the FTX trial because she covered it from start to finish. 3. The episode asks whether the NCAA, the Supreme Court, and the Southern District of New York are all forcing major legal change at once. 4. Alex Lawson explains that a California judge certified a class of 184,000 current and former athletes seeking injunctive relief over NCAA NIL rules. 5. The hosts then note that Judge Claudia Wilkin also certified three damages classes totaling over 14,000 members. 6. Those damages claims cover pre-change NIL restrictions, missed video-game compensation, and current broadcasting-rights disputes. 7. The episode says the NCAA rejects the broadcasting-rights theory, while athletes argue their names, images, and likenesses drive televised college sports. 8. The hosts say a successful damages case could force the NCAA to pay tens of billions of dollars. 9. The discussion shifts to Alston v. NCAA, the 2021 unanimous Supreme Court case that struck down limits on non-cash benefits such as computers and supplies. 10. Justice Brett Kavanaugh's line that “The NCAA is not above the law” is quoted as a broad rebuke of the amateurism model. 11. The NCAA class-cert dispute is described as likely headed toward appeal, but class-cert appeals are called a long shot. 12. A separate Supreme Court case, Rahimi, is introduced through Texas defendant Zaki Rahimi and a domestic violence restraining order that barred him from harassing, stalking, threatening, or possessing a gun. 13. The episode notes that Rahimi was involved in five shootings between December 2020 and January 2021. 14. The Fifth Circuit is said to have held that the gun ban failed under the Supreme Court's 2022 historical-tradition test from Bruen. 15. During oral arguments, the justices are described as skeptical of Rahimi's position, including Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas. 16. Chief Justice Roberts's exchange about whether a “dangerous person” can be disarmed draws laughter from the courtroom. 17. Rachel Scharf then turns to Sam Bankman-Fried, describing FTX as a once-successful crypto exchange that collapsed in November 2022. 18. Scharf says prosecutors alleged that Bankman-Fried commingled FTX and Alameda Research funds, drained close to $10 billion in customer money, and then testified with frequent “I don't recall” answers. 19. The segment on SBF feels reportorial and fast-moving, with Rachel Scharf summarizing testimony and trial strategy in clear, courtroom-specific detail. 20. Listeners who follow antitrust, the Supreme Court, or crypto fraud will get the most out of this episode, while people avoiding sports-law, gun-rights, or trial-coverage updates can skip it.

Listen to the show on

Apple Podcasts Spotify

Play clips from this episode More from Law360's Pro Say - News & Analysis on Law and the Legal Industry