Journal of Philosophy of Emotion Podcast · Journal of Philosophy of Emotion

JPE Book Symposium: The Arc of Love: How Our Romantic Lives Change over Time, Part 2

·1 hr 14 min·6 clips

theory is fecund in the sense that it points ahead to the solutions of questions it does not explicitly broach.

Part 2 opens with bibliographic ceremony. The narration gives the volume, issue, publication date, licenses, article titles, and references before settling into the book symposium on The Arc of Love. The style stays argument first. This is not a conversational back and forth; it is love treated as a problem of necessary conditions, counterexamples, and conceptual cleanup. Benzaev's claim gives the reading its target. The pressure lands on the idea that intrinsic, non-instrumental joint activities are needed for a new and lasting form of romantic attachment. The reply tightens the question. Must the shared activities be intrinsically valuable, or can shared instrumental work bring about the same relational result? The imagined case is intentionally hard. Couples in harsher conditions may work together from dawn to dusk, aiming nearly every shared effort at existence and survival. That case tests the necessity claim. If those partners can still form a long-term romantic relationship, then intrinsic joint activity looks less like a required ingredient. The religious example makes the objection sharper. Even worship, which may look like intrinsic common activity, can be treated as instrumental when done under obligation for protection from adversity. The distinction carries the argument. Love comes across less as a pile of elevated moments than as a relation made through repeated shared agency. The ending turns back to ideology. A later response gestures at criticism of the one-and-only romantic ideal, with Mr. or Mrs. Wright named as the cultural picture under strain. Then the transcript starts to fray. Repeated phrases about writing, adultery, and an obscure ending break into the final stretch, so the audible argument partly disappears.

As heard by us

A focused argument about whether enduring love depends on intrinsically valuable shared activity, or whether instrumental joint work can achieve the same result.

The episode treats romantic love as a serious question: can time alone build something lasting, or does enduring love need shared activity that has value beyond what it gets done?

Read the full review in PlayNext →

Why you'd press play

For when you want a hard look at whether romantic love deepens through time, shared work, or both.

Read the full recommendation in PlayNext →

Listen to the show on

Apple Podcasts Spotify

Play clips from this episode More from Journal of Philosophy of Emotion Podcast