JMU Sports News Network · JMU SportsNews Podcast

College Football Playoff Snub? | JMU Sports News Podcast

·1 hr·4 clips
JMU had a 41% success rate and still averaged 7.05 yards per play against Marshall.
1. JMU Sports News Podcast centers on JMU’s 8-1 season, the Marshall road win, and the College Football Playoff snub conversation. 2. Bennett Conlin and Jack Fitzpatrick host as JMU coverage voices, with Bennett driving the playoff arguments and Jack countering with game-film and statcast reactions. 3. The episode asks whether JMU’s current resume, fan frustration, and on-field improvement are enough to matter in the playoff debate. 4. The hosts say Marshall played well, then separate AP Top 25 recognition from actual playoff selection power. 5. They compare live viewing versus highlights and statcast, with Jack saying he watched the game through numbers and Bennett watching it live. 6. Carlos Del Rio Wilson becomes the first major football topic, with the hosts calling him a strong runner and efficient passer. 7. They note that Wilson’s season looks better after week five, when his role increased and his production changed. 8. Marshall’s run game also comes up, especially the way Roberts handled the ball and created pressure on JMU’s defense. 9. The hosts break down JMU’s offense with specific explosive plays from Sanchez, Wayne Knight, and Wazlowski. 10. They explain that JMU posted a 41% success rate but still finished at 7.05 yards per play against Marshall. 11. Bennett spends a long stretch on the difference between success rate and yards per play, using first-down and third-down examples. 12. The discussion also mentions Marshall’s fake punt and the emotional setting around the game after a plane crash memorial at Marshall. 13. Jack argues that Alonzo Barnett’s recent surge is dramatic, citing 1,124 passing yards over the last four games. 14. They say Barnett’s improved numbers are tied to the staff using him more as a runner and allowing him to scramble. 15. The committee segment focuses on USF at No. 24, JMU being unranked, and the idea that strength of record and predictive metrics favor different teams. 16. Bennett argues that the committee’s logic is inconsistent when it praises teams like Miami and Notre Dame while downgrading JMU. 17. The episode’s tone is argumentative and conversational, with both hosts interrupting, joking, and shifting between stats and frustration. 18. The format is a two-host sports talk show that mixes film notes, ranking debate, and weekly matchup previewing. 19. Listeners who follow JMU football, Sun Belt standings, and CFP debates will get the most from this episode. 20. Listeners who want polished analysis without ranting or conference chaos may skip it.
Listen to the show on