InvestED: The Rule #1 Investing Podcast · Phil Town & Danielle Town

FROM THE VAULT: What Nike’s New Campaign Means for Their Stock

·39 min·2 clips

Nike's Colin Kaepernick ad triggered a stock reaction that changed within days.

1. InvestED: The Rule #1 Investing Podcast uses Nike’s Colin Kaepernick campaign to connect a stock move with consumer and investor behavior. 2. Danielle Towne hosts with Phil Towne, and both speak as investors trying to compare short-term market reactions with long-term value. 3. The episode asks whether a Nike ad can change a stock price and whether that reaction says anything real about the company. 4. Phil starts with a retirement example involving a 55-year-old employee, $1,000 monthly savings, and an assumed 9% market return. 5. He says $200,000 in 10 years could shrink to about $10,000 a year of income at a 5% withdrawal rate. 6. Danielle uses that framing to argue that learning to invest in good companies could lead to a very different retirement outcome. 7. Nike then becomes the case study, with Danielle describing the ad around Colin Kaepernick and Phil noting that Nike also supplies the NFL’s uniforms and apparel. 8. The stock reaction is described in two phases: an initial drop of about 4 or 5 percent, then a sharp rebound over the following two weeks. 9. Danielle says the move reached Nike’s all-time high and shows people voting for and against the company with their money. 10. Phil argues that a controversial ad does not change Nike’s moat or 10-year cash flow in any meaningful way. 11. He cites Warren Buffett’s preference for businesses with such strong moats that “even an idiot can run the company.” 12. Danielle wonders whether Nike’s marketing itself could make the brand more valuable, like Apple’s 1984 campaign. 13. Phil says the trading volume on the ad day was almost 20 million shares, compared with roughly 5 million on an ordinary day. 14. Danielle says the move may be more like fashion than durable business change, because apparel companies can swing with changing taste. 15. Phil agrees that fashion businesses face shorter-term issues than food companies, where trend shifts are slower and easier to see. 16. The conversation broadens to BlackRock, which Danielle says announced a social component in January for investment calculations. 17. Danielle also explains B Corps as a private certification with annual fees and a stamp that can function as a marketing signal. 18. Phil and Danielle return repeatedly to the idea that companies, consumers, and investors are all making value choices with money. 19. People interested in value investing and company ethics would fit this episode. 20. People wanting a pure stock-picking show without social-value debate might skip it.

As heard by us

A Nike ad controversy is used to reinforce a long-term owner mindset.

A Nike ad controversy becomes the episode's investing lesson. Phil and Danielle use the reaction to point back to what matters over time: moat, future cash flow, and the discipline of holding a business long enough to let the thesis play out.

Read the full review in PlayNext →

Why you'd press play

You want a calm take on a noisy Nike headline and the long game behind it.

Read the full recommendation in PlayNext →

Listen to the show on

Apple Podcasts Spotify

Play clips from this episode More from InvestED: The Rule #1 Investing Podcast