Hayek Program Podcast · Mercatus Center at George Mason University

Mario Small — 2024 Markets and Society Conference Keynote

·1 hr 2 min·4 clips
More than 40% of the time, payday lenders are closer in African-American neighborhoods.
1. Hayek Program Podcast presents Mario Small’s keynote on financial institutions and racial inequality. 2. Mario Small, a Columbia University professor and University of Bremen Excellence Chair, uses his research on social context and embedded social capital to frame the talk. 3. The episode asks whether neighborhood proximity to payday lenders helps explain racial differences in attitudes toward those institutions. 4. Small begins with a paper on payday lenders and neighborhood location across 19 of the largest U.S. cities. 5. He defines payday lending as a short-term loan, often around $400, with fees such as $70 and rollover risk that can produce a 450% APR. 6. The neighborhood analysis compares travel time by foot, car, and public transit from every block to the nearest bank and the nearest payday lender. 7. Small reports that more than 40% of African-American neighborhoods had a payday lender faster to reach, compared with about 35% of Latino neighborhoods and 10% of white or Asian neighborhoods. 8. He says the result persisted after adjusting for income, poverty rate, unemployment, education, population density, housing density, and commercial density. 9. A journal editor rejected the paper without review and wrote that Black people just prefer payday lenders. 10. Small says that dismissal led him to test whether the pattern reflected preferences, exposure, or something else. 11. He then compares poor white neighborhoods with affluent African-American and Latino neighborhoods and still finds payday lenders closer in minority neighborhoods. 12. Small notes that the expected story about class differences does not remove the racial gap in those comparisons. 13. He turns to a nationally representative survey of U.S. adults conducted in early 2020 by National Opinion Resource Centers. 14. The survey asks respondents whether they would choose a bank such as Chase, Wells Fargo, or Bank of America, or a payday lender such as Check into Cash, Advance America, or Ace Cash. 15. It also measures attitudes with statements about convenient hours, convenient locations, small loans, and comfort. 16. Small reports that Black respondents are more likely than white respondents to prefer payday lenders, even after adjustment, though most respondents across groups still do not view them positively. 17. He proposes four explanations: mere exposure, convenience, concrete experience, and comparative assessment. 18. Small describes the episode’s style as method-heavy and example-driven, with repeated returns to survey design, adjustment, and experimental controls. 19. Listeners interested in neighborhood effects, racial inequality, and survey research will get the most from this talk. 20. Listeners looking for a short, purely conceptual overview without data may skip it.

As heard by us

A methodical look at how proximity to payday lenders shapes attitudes.

Mario Small's keynote uses payday lenders to examine how social context shapes financial attitudes. It moves from zip-code proximity to perceived closeness and then to an embedded experiment, giving the case a steady, cumulative feel.

Read the full review in PlayNext →

Why you'd press play

You want a careful, seminar-style argument about payday lenders, neighborhood exposure, and why proximity can shape preference.

Read the full recommendation in PlayNext →
Listen to the show on