Hacemos lo que podemos

Lucía Topolansky: «Una cosa mal parida genera todo este lío» y la LUC «fue una ley mal parida»

·55 min·5 clips
Lucía Topolansky argues Uruguay's LUC law was 'mal parida' because it abused constitutional urgency mechanisms for non-urgent matters.
The episode features an interview with Lucía Topolansky, a prominent figure in Uruguay's Frente Amplio and former senator. The conversation begins with a lighthearted discussion about soccer jerseys, where Topolansky explains her suggestion for Uruguay's team to wear half-celeste, half-pink as commentary on political campaign colors. She quickly shifts to criticizing the electoral court's handling of campaign terminology. Topolansky discusses the upcoming referendum on the LUC (Ley de Urgente Consideración), arguing the law was poorly conceived because it used urgent consideration mechanisms for non-urgent matters like artisanal sausage regulations. She reveals that television advertising during elections was more expensive for Frente Amplio than for the governing coalition. The interview covers pandemic management, with Topolansky criticizing vaccination organization and claiming Frente Amplio pressured the government to acquire vaccines. She responds to an audio clip of Senator Graciela Bianchi accusing the MPP of being undemocratic and expresses concern about the National Party's silence. Topolansky analyzes Frente Amplio's 2019 election loss, citing economic stagnation, campaign errors by Daniel Martínez, and internal tensions. She discusses ideological differences with Cabildo Abierto, particularly regarding foreign investment and historical memory issues. The conversation touches on media bias, with Topolansky claiming certain media avoid covering Frente Amplio activities. She evaluates President Lacalle Pou's approval ratings and economic policies, criticizing his focus on wealthy sectors. Throughout, Topolansky emphasizes democratic processes and the importance of the referendum discussion.
Listen to the show on