GCIL PODCAST - Javed Ahmed Ghamidi · Ghamidi Center Of Islamic Learning

Response to 23 Questions - Part 150 - What is Hadith ( Hadees Kya Hai ) - Javed Ahmed Ghamidi

·33 min·2 clips

The Quran, he says, gives Muhammad the same decision-making status in matters of Deen and Shariah.

The conversation opens by marking the completion of 150 episodes in the broader series and by placing this segment inside the larger discussion of what Hadith is. The interviewer lists the four aspects already covered and asks for the fourth, the one that sharpens the speaker's position in the whole discussion. The reply returns to the earlier point that some matters in the Prophetic era are historically clear, while other material still needs a separate standard of reading. From there, the exchange moves into the question of how Hadith is to be judged and what counts as acceptance or rejection. It also revisits the issue of content, meaning what kinds of material are being discussed when people speak about Hadith at all. The speaker explains that the previous session had already covered the historical side, and that what remains is the interpretive side. The discussion then shifts to the example of girls and slaves who are forced, and how moral condition affects whether an extreme punishment applies. The point is not merely descriptive; it is used to show that a ruling can open the door to more than one legal possibility. Once that possibility exists, different jurists may disagree on whether leniency is appropriate. They may also disagree on the extent of that leniency if it is granted. The exchange pauses over those two questions because they are the kind that generate genuine difference among jurists. A Quranic decision in Surah An-Nisa is then brought forward as a case where the answer has already been clarified. The speaker says that the Quran shows that girls and slaves, because of their excuse, are not subject to that extreme punishment. That clarification matters because it settles the principle before the details are worked out. The conversation then turns to the remaining practical question of punishment, since once exemption from the harshest outcome is established, lesser punishment or forgiveness still remain open. The interviewer notes that this creates a field of possible rulings, and that scholars may land on different conclusions within it. Ghamidi Sahab answers by saying that the Prophet's directive in such matters carries the same status as the decision of Allah. The basis, he says, is stated by the Quran itself in the next part of the decision. The episode then closes after making that link between Prophetic decision and Quranic authority explicit. Its method is sequential, technical, and careful, with each step resting on the one before it. The whole exchange is less about rhetoric than about how a legal distinction is built and justified. The listener is left with a sharper sense of how Hadith, precedent, and Quranic text are being related in this framework.

As heard by us

A careful Hadith discussion that moves from definition to legal authority with clear textual anchors.

The episode keeps returning to one question: what gives a Hadith authority, and when does a reported Prophetic decision carry the force of law.

Read the full review in PlayNext →

Why you'd press play

You want Hadith treated as a question of authority, not just narration.

Read the full recommendation in PlayNext →

Listen to the show on

Apple Podcasts Spotify

Play clips from this episode More from GCIL PODCAST - Javed Ahmed Ghamidi