Foul Play: A Historical True Crime Podcast · Shane L. Waters, Wendy Cee, Gemma Hoskins

London: A Murder Verdict in Victorian Court

February 24, 2026·29 min·1 clip

After 12 days of testimony, the jury returned a guilty verdict in 82 minutes.

1. Foul Play: A Historical True Crime Podcast centers this episode on London, John Parsons Cook’s murder verdict, and the Victorian toxicology case against William Palmer. 2. Hosts frame Dr. Alfred Swain Taylor as England’s leading toxicologist and William Palmer as the surgeon accused of poisoning Cook and other relatives. 3. The episode asks whether Victorian law could convict a man of poison murder when the poison could not be found in the body. 4. Taylor examines Cook’s stomach, intestines, and blood at Guy’s Hospital in December 1855 and finds antimony but no strychnine. 5. The episode explains that Cook’s convulsions, opistotonous, and respiratory paralysis still matched strychnic poisoning. 6. William Stevens demands answers about Cook’s racing winnings and the betting books after arriving in Rugeley as Cook’s stepfather. 7. The local authorities order an inquest and send the specimens to London for Taylor’s analysis. 8. Taylor’s reputation rests on the Marsh test, his medical jurisprudence textbook, and courtroom testimony that juries trusted. 9. The episode notes that strychnine metabolizes quickly, unlike arsenic, which helped explain why chemical traces could be absent. 10. Palmer tries to interfere with the investigation by seeking letters from Samuel Cheshire and sending a ten-pound bribe to the coroner. 11. The letter with the bribe is intercepted, and the episode treats it as documented evidence of Palmer’s desperation. 12. Exhumations follow for Anne Palmer and Walter Palmer, both tied to insurance money and suspicious deaths. 13. Anne Palmer’s coffin is found remarkably preserved, and the original physician changes his view and believes she was poisoned. 14. Parliament passes the Central Criminal Court Act of 1856, later called Palmer’s Act, because Staffordshire cannot offer an impartial jury. 15. At the Old Bailey on May 14, 1856, The Times devotes more than 50 articles to a trial that fills the gallery before dawn. 16. Attorney General Sir Alex Coburn and the prosecution build their case around Charles Newton, Elizabeth Mills, and the financial records. 17. Taylor tells the jury that the appearances in Cook’s case justify the conclusion that he died from tetanus produced by some irritant poison, probably strychnine. 18. Sergeant Shi and defense witnesses attack Taylor’s method, while a defense witness’s false insurance testimony collapses credibility. 19. The episode uses a brisk historical-narrative style with courtroom detail, forensic explanation, and frequent returns to specific dates, names, and documents. 20. Listeners interested in Victorian crime, forensic history, and legal procedure will get the most from it, while listeners wanting a light or spoiler-free mystery may skip it.

As heard by us

A poisoning case where the missing poison matters as much as the proof that is found.

Set in a London laboratory and courtroom, this account builds a poisoning case around what cannot be shown. Dr. Alfred Swain Taylor examines the stomach, intestines, and blood, finds traces of antimony, and still cannot detect the poison that matched John Parsons Cook's…

Read the full review in PlayNext →

Why you'd press play

When strychnine leaves no trace, the courtroom becomes the only weapon left.

Read the full recommendation in PlayNext →

Listen to the show on

Apple Podcasts Spotify

Play clips from this episode More from Foul Play: A Historical True Crime Podcast