Fantasy Footballers - Fantasy Football Podcast · Fantasy Football

The TRUTH: Top 10 Fantasy QBs + Wheel of Shame - Fantasy Football Podcast for 1/15

·1 hr 17 min·7 clips
The shocking truth: no quarterback averaged more than 23 fantasy points per game in 2025.
The episode starts in familiar Fantasy Footballers mode, with quick jokes and loose table energy before the football talk takes over. From there, the hosts introduce the Truth series and explain that the point is to measure who helped fantasy managers the most, not merely who landed highest in season totals. That difference matters to them because fantasy points can flatten the shape of a season. A player can look elite on paper while carrying too many empty weeks. Another can finish lower than expected while still providing real help along the way. They focus first on quarterbacks and walk through the score cuts they use for the position. A great game is 26 or more points in their format. A good game is 21 or more. A bust game is anything under 15. They also note that missed games are not counted against consistency. Some late Week 18 games are removed by hand when the start-sit reality makes the raw data misleading. That keeps the evaluation tied to the actual fantasy experience of the manager, which is the whole point of the exercise. The hosts also explain that the metrics change from year to year and point to examples that show why total finish alone can mislead. A player can climb near the top while building a season on a small number of big games, so the Truth series tries to separate steady value from spike weeks. They want to know whether the production was dependable, explosive, frustrating, or some unstable mix of all three. The tone stays conversational, but the work underneath it is serious. They are not just reciting rankings. They are trying to explain what those rankings felt like to live through. Because the show is a panel, the discussion moves fast and keeps interrupting itself just enough to stay funny. One host starts a thought, another cuts in with a joke, and then the group lands back on the actual fantasy consequence. That rhythm keeps the episode from sounding like a spreadsheet readout. The analysis still comes through clearly, especially around how different types of games shape season-long value. The hosts care about what a player did for your team when you actually had to start him. The episode also fits the show's usual habit of blending football talk with recurring bits and sponsor scaffolding without losing the core point. The closing stretch keeps the same high-energy, community-first feel the show is known for. Even when the room drifts into jokes and promotions, the episode has already done the job it came for: giving listeners a better lens on quarterback performance in fantasy football. The result is a ranking conversation with some teeth, not just another list. Listeners who care about quarterback stability, waiver-driven decision-making, and the gap between a headline finish and a week-to-week advantage will find a lot to chew on here. The episode rewards people who enjoy fantasy football as both argument and math problem.

As heard by us

A quarterback Truth-series breakdown that favors week-to-week fantasy impact over raw final ranking.

This quarterback installment of the Truth series asks a more useful question than a season-long leaderboard: who actually helped a fantasy lineup week to week, and who only looked strong in the totals?

Read the full review in PlayNext →

Why you'd press play

Press play if you want QB rankings that break down who actually helped your fantasy lineup.

Read the full recommendation in PlayNext →
Listen to the show on