Arrivano nuove regole antitrust: concorrenza fa rima con resilienza?

·11 min·1 clip

Giorgio Lutelli reveals how the word 'resilience' is driving a decisive rewrite of Europe's 20-year-old antitrust rules.

The episode opens by identifying 'resilience' as a central, pervasive term in current European economic and political discourse, linking it to the legacy of the PNRR. It announces the main topic: a decisive shift in how Brussels will judge major corporate mergers under updated antitrust guidelines. The political impetus is traced to a mission letter from Commission President Ursula von der Leyen to Executive Vice-President Teresa Ribeira in September 2024, calling for a competition policy that supports European companies on global markets. This directive is contextualized within Mario Draghi's report on European competitiveness, which noted Europe's market fragmentation and underinvestment compared to rivals. Draghi's report suggested competition policy should not hinder European goals, advocating for greater weight on security, innovation, and resilience in strategic sectors. The episode then explores the practical implications of prioritizing 'resilience' in antitrust assessments, questioning whether it means facilitating the creation of European champions to rival American and Chinese giants. Commissioner Ribeira's public statements are cited, emphasizing that the new rules will consider longer-term factors like innovation and sustainability without offering a 'blank check' for consolidation. The Commission's cautious approach is outlined, including a March 2026 stakeholder dialogue focusing on innovation, sustainability, and cost of living as key axes for reform. Significant resistance to the reform is detailed, with critics warning of 'resilience washing'—using geopolitical concepts to justify anti-competitive mergers. A coalition including Finland, Ireland, and the Czech Republic argues current rules are sufficient and that over-concentration could reduce resilience by creating dependency on few suppliers. The episode specifies that the Commission aims to facilitate cross-border, European-scale operations in sectors like telecommunications, defense, space, energy, and digital infrastructure. The blocked Siemens-Alstom railway merger is presented as a symbolic case, illustrating the tension between applying domestic-market rules in a global competitive landscape. The reform is framed not as a simple deregulation but as an attempt to balance market competition with industrial strategy and economic security. The concluding segment poses the fundamental question: to compete with the US and China, does Europe need larger companies or better markets? The episode suggests Brussels' intended answer is 'both,' but acknowledges the extreme difficulty of achieving this balance in practice.

Listen to the show on

Apple Podcasts Spotify

Play clips from this episode More from Eurofocus