EN CONTEXTO · Medcom Digital

Alfabetización constitucional: avances del proceso - Miguel Antonio Bernal coordinador de la Secretaría Presidencial

·27 min·2 clips

A constitutional expert reveals Panama has operated under an imposed text for 54 years, leaving citizens unaware of their rights.

1. EN CONTEXTO host Adela Coriad interviews Dr. Miguel Antonio Bernal, coordinator of the Secretaría Presidencial, about the progress of Panama's constitutional literacy and reform process. 2. Dr. Bernal serves as the leading public figure driving the constitutional alphabetization campaign and serves as coordinator of the presidential secretariat tasked with civic education on constitutional reform. 3. The episode examines how far Panama's constitutional reform movement has advanced and what structural barriers remain before a constituent assembly can be convened. 4. Bernal states that Panama has operated under an imposed constitutional text for 54 years and that civic education was abandoned for 58 years, leaving most citizens unaware of their rights, duties, or the function of a constitution. 5. The constitutional literacy campaign has reached nearly 250,000 citizens through conferences, lectures, workshops, and media interviews conducted by Bernal's team. 6. President José Raúl Molino has committed to convening a constituent assembly, and the secretariat's draft calendar targets July 2026 for publishing the decree establishing requirements for constituyente candidates. 7. Bernal proposes that constituyentes must be Panamanian by birth, of legal age, and must not hold positions with command and jurisdiction in the public sector, to prevent incumbents from dominating the process. 8. He estimates the assembly should have around 51 members and should complete its work in 60 days, drawing on draft proposals already circulating — six constitutional proposals have been developed in Panama since 1990. 9. The secretariat's role is described as a relay runner (correr transmisión), forwarding citizen proposals to the elected constituyentes rather than drafting the constitution itself. 10. The Electoral Tribunal has formally refused to participate, sending back a rejection letter and making public declarations against a new constitution, which Bernal criticizes as an abdication of institutional responsibility. 11. Bernal discloses that the Asamblea Nacional's decision to accelerate the election of a new Electoral Tribunal magistrate in April — rather than December — appears to be a political trade for the Defensoría del Pueblo appointment. 12. Major business associations — CAPAC, the Cámara de Comercio, and the Sindicato de Industriales (which refused to receive the team) — have shown little institutional interest despite individual businesspeople inviting the secretariat to their companies. 13. All political parties are described as aligned with the militarist constitution and opposed to reform because a new constitution would reduce their structural advantages. 14. Bernal identifies a pervasive fear among elites of genuine citizen participation, arguing that Panamanians have been denied the tools to exercise constitutional power for decades. 15. He notes that young people and churches have been the most receptive audiences, while civic clubs such as the Cámara Junior, Kiwanis, and the Club 20-30 have also welcomed the campaign. 16. On canal-related concerns, Bernal argues the Canal chapter should not be touched in substance but that a Water Authority should be constitutionally established given the global significance of water and canal security. 17. He calls for a total restructuring of the three branches of the state, the elimination of what he calls dysfunctional presidentialism, and root-and-branch reform of the judicial system. 18. The interview is conducted in a direct, conversational format; Coriad presses Bernal on ambiguities and Bernal responds with frank, sometimes blunt answers about political actors by name. 19. Panamanian listeners engaged with the politics of constitutional reform, civic education, or electoral system accountability would find the episode substantive. 20. Listeners uninterested in Panamanian domestic politics or unfamiliar with the country's institutional history would find little that applies to their context.

Listen to the show on

Apple Podcasts Spotify

Play clips from this episode More from EN CONTEXTO