Eclectic Gamers Podcast - Pinball & Video Games · Dennis Kriesel & Tony Kurkowski

Episode 250 - Iconic

·1 hr 9 min·6 clips
Why does the host dismiss episode 250 as not special, despite it being a major milestone?
This episode of the Eclectic Gamers Podcast marks the show's 250th installment. Hosts reflect on podcasting milestones and the importance of consistent release schedules. They debate whether round-numbered episodes like this one hold any special significance. The conversation addresses a listener correction regarding the difference between nostalgia and sentimentality in the context of collecting. One host previously stated he wasn't nostalgic about getting rid of a pinball machine, but the listener clarified the correct term should have been sentimentality. The hosts briefly mention Dan Carlin's podcast as an exception to their rule about consistent publishing. They critique Carlin's infrequent release schedule, suggesting he should publish at least every six months. The discussion highlights the hosts' belief that regular output is crucial for maintaining an audience. They note that other podcasts which de-emphasize consistency often experience significant periods of inactivity. The tone is self-referential, focusing on their own podcasting practices and minor corrections. A surprising claim is that the hosts do not particularly celebrate milestone episodes, despite reaching number 250. They argue they have experienced many such milestones already. An interesting insight is their admission that they still eagerly listen to certain very infrequent shows, creating an exception to their own philosophy. The memorable moment is the direct, joking address to Dan Carlin, telling him to "get it together." The hosts position consistency as a key differentiator between podcasts that endure and those that falter. They frame listener feedback and corrections as a normal part of their process. The tone is casual, conversational, and filled with inside jokes between the co-hosts. The style is informal, revolving around meta-commentary about podcasting itself rather than gaming topics. Longtime listeners who enjoy the hosts' camaraderie and behind-the-scenes podcast shop talk would appreciate this episode. Listeners seeking deep dives into specific pinball or video games might find this content too self-referential and skip it.

As heard by us

A relaxed pinball conversation about consistency and a three-way Elvira ranking.

Episode 250 stays loose and unhurried, moving from the milestone itself to a familiar case for steady output and the odd way some shows win people back after a long gap. It does not reach for a bigger thesis than that, and that restraint suits it.

Read the full review in PlayNext →

Why you'd press play

If you like a pinball debate that turns into collector logic, this one lands cleanly.

Read the full recommendation in PlayNext →
Listen to the show on