EBTC Radiopredigten Podcast · EBTC Radiopredigten

Unaufhaltsam | Leben unter gottlosen Autoritäten | Apostelgeschichte 25-26 | Jonathan de Vries

·1 hr 4 min·5 clips

How did the COVID-19 pandemic force Christians to confront the tension between their faith and government health mandates?

1. Jonathan de Vries preaches an expository sermon on Acts 25-26 at an EBTC conference, addressing how Christians should conduct themselves under godless state authorities. 2. The preacher is not named within the transcript section available, but the episode title identifies him as Jonathan de Vries. 3. The sermon's stated thesis is that a Christian living under godless authority is not called to become a resistance fighter, but to display Christ through behavior, action, and speech. 4. De Vries opens with the observation that COVID-19 restrictions — banned hugs, mandatory masks, professional vaccination requirements, and limited church services — created an unprecedented crisis of trust in government among German-speaking Christians. 5. He notes that since COVID, skepticism toward state authority, complaints about school attendance requirements, bureaucracy, and gender ideology have all increased measurably, including within the local congregation. 6. The sermon covers Acts 25-26 in two chapters at once because Lukas (Luke) slows the narrative pace deliberately at this point — the beginning of Acts moves at high speed across multiple cities and years, but chapters 25-26 dwell at length on a single situation. 7. Acts 25 presents Paul as a political football passed from Jerusalem to Felix to Festus and finally to Agrippa — imprisoned for several years without conviction, without evidence, and without a crime. 8. The first command — 'beuge dich freiwillig' (submit voluntarily) — is demonstrated by Paul's refusal to exploit his proven innocence to argue for freedom, instead invoking his legal right as a Roman citizen to appeal to the Emperor. 9. De Vries points out that Paul could have reminded Festus of the Gallio precedent in Corinth, where a previous Roman magistrate ruled that Jewish religious disputes fell outside Roman jurisdiction and released Paul — but Paul makes none of these arguments. 10. The reason for Paul's voluntary submission is grounded in two principles: he understands his responsibility before God, and he understands his responsibility before the state as described in Romans 13:1. 11. De Vries reads 2 Corinthians 5:9-10 — every person must appear before the judgment seat of Christ — and contrasts it with the German court hierarchy (Amtsgericht, Landesgericht, Oberlandesgericht, Bundesgerichtshof), placing Christ's judgment seat as the final and irreversible instance above all others. 12. From Romans 13:1, de Vries draws the principle that every earthly authority — including Pilate, Felix, Festus, and Nero — was appointed by God, which means Paul's posture before Festus is not defeat but deliberate, theologically-grounded submission. 13. He applies this practically to three everyday situations: receiving a parking ticket without complaint, honoring police as God-appointed guardians, and paying taxes willingly. 14. The second command — 'bringe sie in Verlegenheit' (bring them to embarrassment/discomfort) — is demonstrated by Festus's public admission to Agrippa that he has no legitimate charge to send to the Emperor. 15. De Vries identifies the three factors that create Festus's dilemma: Paul is provably innocent, Roman law requires him to act on that innocence, and the Jewish leadership is politically dangerous to antagonize. 16. He traces this same three-factor conflict through four parallel biblical cases: Darius's conflict with the law and Daniel, Herod's conflict with John the Baptist, the chief priests' conflict over Jesus's question about John's authority, and Pilate's conflict with the Jewish crowd over Jesus. 17. The third command — 'bezeuge Jesus mutig' (witness Jesus boldly) — is demonstrated in Acts 26, where Paul uses his appearance before Agrippa not to defend himself but to testify about his conversion on the Damascus road and the resurrection of Christ. 18. The sermon is delivered in German in an energetic, direct style with contemporary illustrations drawn from German civic life — parking fines, the Bundesgerichtshof, COVID restrictions, Scholz and Wegner as current officeholders. 19. The intended audience is a German-speaking evangelical congregation navigating genuine post-COVID disillusionment with state authority, to whom the sermon offers a positive theological case for submission rather than a rebuke. 20. Listeners who will benefit most are German-speaking Christians wrestling with how to respond to government authority they distrust; those seeking a detailed verse-by-verse exposition of Acts 25-26 will find the sermon more thematic than exegetical.

Listen to the show on

Apple Podcasts Spotify

Play clips from this episode More from EBTC Radiopredigten Podcast