Due Parenting Podcast · Due Parenting Podcast

Dream Nurture Foundation: What it Takes to Run a Children NGO in Nigeria

·1 hr 18 min·5 clips

She says one morning at the well made her decide, 'no child in this world has to feel the way I'm feeling.'

The episode starts in a loose, joking rhythm, with the hosts teasing out how a word-association game is supposed to work. One host keeps correcting the others, which gives the opening a lived-in, family-table feel. That easy banter gives way to a more serious story about children who are already waiting, already out on the road, already being noticed. The speaker explains that she went looking into one girl’s situation and took her in. She says she kept going back to the area where she found the girl, because the same pattern kept showing up. The discussion then broadens to the fact that many of these children still have parents or some kind of living family member. Some live with one parent, and some live with another relative who is still around. The issue is not always total abandonment. Often it is a lack of supervision, a child moving around too freely, and adults assuming someone else is watching. The speaker makes it clear that children cannot simply be passed along without permission. She says the living parent, or the single mother or single father, has to sign off. That permission is treated as essential, not optional. She also pushes back against excuses when someone claims there is no one responsible for the child. Her point is that responsibility usually exists somewhere, even if people are trying to dodge it. The episode suggests that some parents or families were willing to let children go until Jim Catcher’s Academy became famous. But once the children became known, the attitude changed. That shift comes across as hypocritical and plain to see. The child is not supposed to become valuable only after recognition arrives. The conversation keeps coming back to that basic moral tension. The hosts also keep the show’s familiar, teasing rhythm, so the seriousness never lands like a lecture. Instead, it comes through story, correction, and shared disgust at how people behave. The result is an episode about child welfare that feels personal rather than institutional. It is less polished advocacy than a direct look at the moral burden of looking after children properly.

As heard by us

A warm, practical look at child care, permission, and the uneasy politics of who gets to claim a child.

This episode spends most of its time on the ordinary labor of caring for children, and it keeps circling one stubborn question: who is responsible when freedom, family, and supervision do not line up neatly?

Read the full review in PlayNext →

Why you'd press play

Press play if you want an honest look at child care, permission, and the everyday rules around looking after kids.

Read the full recommendation in PlayNext →

Listen to the show on

Apple Podcasts Spotify

Play clips from this episode More from Due Parenting Podcast