Dissens · Lukas Ondreka

Wie die Klimabewegung den Gaseinstieg verhindern will

·1 hr 31 min·7 clips

Anka Esser reveals how the climate movement is fighting a massive fossil fuel rollback led by Germany's economy minister.

1. This Was-Tun-Podcast episode features hosts Ingen and Valentin in conversation with Anka Esser from Gaswende and Ende Gelände about Germany's fossil gas rollback and movement strategy. 2. Anka Esser has been a climate activist for over ten years, starting in Berlin campaigns that achieved the coal exit, and then moving to work specifically on gas infrastructure through the Gaswende organisation. 3. The episode's core argument is that Germany is currently in a fossil 'Gaseinstieg' (gas entry) driven by Economy Minister Katharina Reiche's simultaneous legislative attacks on renewable energy across four policy areas. 4. Katharina Reiche is a former CEO of WestEnergie, an E.ON subsidiary; investigative journalism found her ten-point energy monitoring document closely mirrored positions of RWE and E.ON, demonstrating direct lobby influence on policy. 5. Reiche's power-plant strategy originally aimed to build 20 gigawatts of new gas-fired capacity using public subsidies; the EU intervened to limit this to 10 gigawatts, which Reiche is pushing to pass into law before the parliamentary summer recess. 6. The building energy law's requirement that new heating installations be at least 75% renewable is being abolished, allowing gas heaters to be installed again — Anka says this is structurally unjust because tenants bear rising gas running costs while landlords benefit from cheaper installation. 7. Feed-in tariffs for rooftop solar are being stripped from the renewable energy law without a replacement mechanism, creating financial uncertainty for existing and future solar installations and undermining distributed energy participation. 8. The grid package changes penalise renewables by removing payments to installations that must curtail output when the grid is full, making them non-profitable, while the stated rationale — grid stability — could be addressed through storage investment instead. 9. Anka notes that one week before the interview, Germany ran entirely on renewables in the electricity sector for a period, demonstrating that storage and smart grid technology are advancing faster than political planning acknowledges. 10. Germany's gas dependence creates strategic exposure: Anka cites price shocks linked to the war in Ukraine and the 2026 war in Iran as evidence that fossil energy prices are structurally volatile and controlled by autocratic states. 11. A positive movement example from Reichling, Bavaria: after the mayor called incoming Fridays for Future demonstrators 'climate terrorists', FFF responded by arriving with flowers and cake, generating media coverage that reproduced their press release almost verbatim and led to a local citizen's initiative forming against gas drilling. 12. The Reichling case now includes posters reading 'core gas' throughout the village and a local pastor who declared 'Jesus would have been a climate activist', illustrating how broad coalitions can form around specific local gas infrastructure targets. 13. Anka explains framing research showing that negating an opponent's frame — 'gas is not a bridge technology' — reinforces the frame in listeners' minds, leaving 'bridge technology' as the memorable phrase. 14. Gaswende's alternative messaging frames gas as a 'risk technology', renewables as 'reliable, democratic, clean', and LNG as 'fracking gas' — the latter activating existing negative German associations with fracking that are largely absent from the technical abbreviation LNG. 15. The fossil lobby habitually presents unproven or expensive technologies — hydrogen refit of LNG terminals, carbon capture — as greening future scenarios, but in practice retrofit capability is partial and costly; calling these 'risk technologies' is the strategic counter-frame. 16. Gaswende is building a public map of gas infrastructure across Germany, modelled on coal protest maps, to show the climate movement where new crystallisation points for local action might emerge. 17. Ingen notes it is harder to mobilise people against a minister seen as broadly aligned with climate goals (citing Robert Habeck and LNG expansion under the Ampel coalition) than against Katharina Reiche, whose fossil-lobby background makes her a visible embodiment of the problem. 18. The episode is a relaxed strategic conversation between movement practitioners, mixing German technical policy vocabulary with English terms for movement concepts, with a self-aware tone about what the left got wrong in recent years. 19. Listeners interested in German climate policy, movement strategy, framing and messaging, or the transition from the coal to the gas campaign will find this episode directly useful. 20. Listeners seeking emotional narrative storytelling, English-language content, or coverage of climate science rather than movement strategy and policy will not be the primary audience.

Listen to the show on

Apple Podcasts Spotify

Play clips from this episode More from Dissens