Diemer & DiBello · Matthew Diemer: Politics, Cleveland, Congress, Senate, Ohio, News, Commentary

Trump's Conviction, Biden's Veto, and Nuclear Energy Initiatives

·1 hr 26 min·5 clips
"American money in politics" is called "the biggest problem in the world."
1. Diemer & DiBello centers this episode on Cleveland campaign finance, Biden's Ohio ballot status, and a set of election-law disputes. 2. Deamer and DeBello host the show as a two-person conversation, and they keep returning to Cleveland examples because both speak as local political observers. 3. The episode asks whether campaign-money rules, ballot rules, and enforcement choices are being used fairly or selectively. 4. The first major topic is Cleveland City Council's plan to double individual campaign donations from $1,500 to $3,000. 5. One host argues that rising the limit does not solve the deeper problem, because Citizens United and super PACs already shape elections with hidden money. 6. The conversation names Sherrod Brown, Justin Bibb, Bernie Moreno, and Jimmy Haslam as examples of how ad spending and donor influence appear in Ohio politics. 7. The hosts also discuss how wealthy donors can contribute through spouses, children, and PAC structures while staying inside legal limits. 8. A second topic is the idea of public matching funds, including a New York-style system that would cap private fundraising and add government money. 9. The proposed model is described with concrete numbers such as $200,000 from individuals, 1,000 donors, and an $800,000 public match for a congressional race. 10. The Cleveland version would require a local candidate to raise an initial amount from residents before the city adds matching money. 11. One of the most pointed moments is the claim that American money in politics is "the biggest problem in the world," which is tied to First Energy's $60 million effort around Householder. 12. The speakers repeatedly say they would rather see donor identities fully disclosed than have dark-money structures and super PACs hide who is paying. 13. Another recurring example is the Cleveland Plain Dealer's coverage choices, with one host saying the paper would not print his name while promoting Justin Bibb before he announced. 14. The second half turns to Ohio's dispute over Joe Biden being on the ballot before the August Chicago convention. 15. The hosts explain that the DNC used a virtual roll call so Biden would qualify in time, while Ohio officials pushed a separate bill that also targeted foreign money in ballot-initiative campaigns. 16. They describe that bill as a "poison pill" attached to the ballot fix, and they question how the foreign-money restriction would be enforced. 17. The tone is argumentative and conversational, with both hosts interrupting, correcting each other, and using local examples to test each point. 18. The format is a long back-and-forth rather than a scripted explainer, and the energy stays reactive as the discussion moves from sports to Cleveland politics to state election law. 19. Listeners interested in Cleveland politics, campaign finance, and Ohio election rules would likely get the most from it. 20. Listeners wanting a brief sports segment or a tightly edited news recap might skip it.

As heard by us

A loose hangout that turns into a skeptical talk about selective enforcement and political power.

Two Cleveland guys start with the Guards and Jose Ramirez, then drift into name-change rules, selective enforcement, Congress, Trump, and the money behind political loyalty.

Read the full review in PlayNext →

Why you'd press play

If you want politics talk that starts with baseball and ends at selective enforcement.

Read the full recommendation in PlayNext →
Listen to the show on