USA-IRAN, GIORNO DEI COLLOQUI | TRUMP MINACCIA: “SE FALLISCONO ATTACCHIAMO” | Ep47🔴

April 11, 2026·51 min·3 clips

The US came to Iran, bombed it, achieved nothing on the nuclear issue, and is now begging Pakistan to convince Iran to grant a concession — that is the only honest summary, says Torresi.

1. Danilo Torresi, an Italian political commentator, hosts a live stream on the Danilo Torresi podcast on the day US-Iran talks begin in Islamabad mediated by Pakistan. 2. The host is the sole speaker; no guests appear; the format is a solo live commentary reading chat messages and reacting to news as it develops. 3. The episode's core argument is that the US entered Iran without achieving its objectives and is now in Pakistan seeking Iranian concessions — a reversal of the power dynamic implied by mainstream reporting. 4. Torresi opens by reading a viewer comment calling the ceasefire Iran's fault for keeping Hormuz closed after Israel bombed Lebanon — he uses it as a case study in what he calls widespread analytical failure among the Italian public. 5. Iran's three stated conditions for the Islamabad talks are: Hormuz opened with war reparations paid, release of frozen assets, and a ceasefire for the entire region including Lebanon. 6. Torresi argues that Hormuz — the only American claim to having achieved something — was not blocked before the US attack, making the reopening demand a solution to a self-created problem. 7. He uses the metaphor of a person setting a forest fire and arriving with a bucket of water as a 'firefighter' to describe the US's diplomatic framing of the ceasefire as a win. 8. Torresi states that the US-Iran negotiating sessions on February 27th reportedly went well, and the US attacked on February 28th — arguing the attack was months in preparation and the negotiators were deliberately keeping Iran uninformed. 9. He notes the irony of J.D. Vance complaining about Iran's lack of trust, when the US was the party that attacked during active diplomacy. 10. Torresi's theory for the ceasefire: the US consumed too many precision missiles and could not safely continue the campaign if Iran resumed full offensive operations against exposed US and Israeli targets without adequate interception capacity. 11. On energy: he warns that if the war had continued and the barrel reached $150, Italian fuel prices could have hit 3 euros per litre, inflicting serious damage on low-income Italian households. 12. UK Prime Minister Starmer is cited as blaming both Trump and Putin for energy price increases; Torresi calls this incoherent since energy prices were at a low before the US attacked Iran. 13. On Italy's role, Torresi says Italy gave the US full use of its bases for the Middle East operations, with only one flight from Sigonella reportedly blocked for a communications issue — he says Italy received American thanks for full cooperation. 14. He argues Europe should have refused use of its bases once the US attacked Iran without UN authorization, and that Europe's failure to respond to Trump's tariffs emboldened further US unilateralism. 15. On Israel, Torresi argues Israel's goals are permanent border expansion using the same Gaza model applied to Lebanon and Syria, and that Israel does not want a truce. 16. He also discusses Ukraine, arguing the war has no military solution and that European billions spent there represent an opportunity cost — he says Russia does not intend to invade Europe. 17. Torresi frequently interacts with live chat, reading and reacting to viewer comments, which gives the episode an informal, reactive format. 18. The tone is confrontational, sardonic, and explicitly pro-European-interest, with frequent use of Italian slang and strong language; the host describes himself as not pro-Russia but deeply critical of Washington. 19. Italian listeners who are sceptical of mainstream Western coverage of the Iran war and want a contrarian anti-NATO perspective from an independent Italian commentator will find this episode useful. 20. Listeners seeking sourced, documented analysis rather than editorial commentary, or who want an English-language or pro-US-policy perspective, will not find this episode appropriate.

Listen to the show on

Apple Podcasts Spotify

Play clips from this episode More from Danilo Torresi