Conversations with Coleman · The Free Press

Coleman Hughes and Glenn Greenwald Debate Israel’s Influence on Washington

March 25, 2026·2 hr 5 min·5 clips

Glenn Greenwald reveals how the U.S. government forces universities to adopt speech codes that shield Israel from criticism.

The setup is procedural, not dramatic. Hughes says he and Glenn Greenwald were supposed to debate the Israel lobby at a live event in New York City, then uses the canceled event as the reason for a conversation. Most of the exchange stays close to American power. Hughes treats aid to Israel as a tiny piece of the federal budget and asks why it draws more outrage than aid or protection tied to South Korea and Europe. Greenwald does not let that framing slide past him. Before he answers, he asks whether Hughes is using bias as a softer word for bigotry or anti-Semitism. Hughes says no, plainly. If he meant anti-Semitism, he says, he would call it that. From there he separates cognitive bias against a country from bigotry against Jews. His theory is racial and political: Israel is often read as part of the white Western world, so its actions in the Middle East get judged through an oppressor-oppressed lens people already know. That is where the pressure sits. Greenwald wants bias defined before the argument goes anywhere. Hughes wants the asymmetry explained. Why does this aid relationship, in particular, trigger such a different moral response than South Korea and Europe? The exchange is short, but it has a real edge because both men keep dragging vague words back to their exact meaning. The final turn shifts to journalism. Hughes asks Greenwald about accountability and the repeated promotion of claims Hughes calls false: the 2020 election being stolen, Pizzagate treated as basically real, underwater alien entities, and Alex Jones as a supernatural prophet who predicted 9/11. This is not just media gossip. It asks what a journalist owes the audience when claims are delivered to millions as true.

As heard by us

A sharp Hughes-Greenwald debate on Israel's influence, Iran, campus speech, and media accountability.

Coleman Hughes and Glenn Greenwald turn a canceled New York debate into a tense argument about Israel's influence in Washington, US aid, and the line between legitimate criticism of Israel, ideological bias, and anti-Semitism.

Read the full review in PlayNext →

Why you'd press play

If you want a debate that keeps interrogating its own premises, start here.

Read the full recommendation in PlayNext →

Listen to the show on

Apple Podcasts Spotify

Play clips from this episode More from Conversations with Coleman