Leadership Lessons from The Washington Post’s Non-Endorsement

·27 min·2 clips

Jeff Bezos blocked The Washington Post from endorsing Kamala Harris, overturning 50 years of precedent and the paper's own principles.

The episode begins with hosts Tom Fox and Matt Kelly introducing the topic: Jeff Bezos, owner of The Washington Post, refused to allow the paper to endorse Kamala Harris for president, overturning a 50-year precedent. Matt Kelly sets the stage, noting the decision came 11 days before the election and has led to widespread speculation that Bezos acted out of fear of financial retaliation from a potential Trump administration. He reports that The Post lost about 200,000 subscribers, roughly 8% of its base, costing an estimated $24 million. Kelly explains the standard governance of newspapers, where owners hire publishers who hire editors, with editorial boards operating independently to write endorsements. He details The Washington Post's principles, particularly principle five (duty to readers, not owners) and six (willingness to sacrifice material fortunes for public good), which Bezos's action violated. The hosts discuss the leadership failure, noting Bezos created confusion and betrayed stakeholders without explanation. They explore the slippery slope of owner intervention potentially leading to biased coverage. Kelly draws parallels to past corporate turmoil during the Trump administration, citing examples like Salesforce and Wayfair facing employee and customer backlash for government contracts. The episode concludes by warning that similar internal tensions will resurface for companies dealing with a potential second Trump administration, posing significant compliance and ethical challenges.

Listen to the show on

Apple Podcasts Spotify

Play clips from this episode More from Compliance into the Weeds