Commentary on the Gospel of John, Book 1 · Cyril of Alexandria

010 - Chapter 9 That the soul of man does not exist prior to the body nor is the embodiment a consequence

·42 min·2 clips

He calls the preexistence theory “a most ridiculous fable” and attacks “foolish pratings.”

1. Commentary on the Gospel of John, Book 1, Chapter 9 centers on the line “He was the very light which lighteth every man that cometh into the world.” 2. Cyril of Alexandria is the author named in the recording, and Rev. Philip Edward Pusey is named as translator. 3. The chapter asks whether “the only begotten is indeed God, the very light” or whether angels and men can also enlighten minds. 4. Cyril cites Cornelius, Manoah, Zechariah, and Daniel as examples of angels revealing hidden things. 5. He adds the Ethiopian eunuch and Philip to show that human teachers can explain Scripture by imparted knowledge. 6. His core thesis is that creatures receive light by participation, while the Word gives light as God by nature. 7. He says the saints are called “light” and “gods” by grace, not by unchangeable essence. 8. Cyril distinguishes teaching from revelation by saying the rational creation enlightens others through “ideas out of the mind.” 9. He argues that the Word “lighteth every man” by creating in human nature a “seed of wisdom” and “root of understanding.” 10. He uses Adam to argue that human understanding was present “from the first beginnings of his being.” 11. The text says the Word is present “with the angels in heaven,” “on the earth,” and “in hell itself,” while remaining uncircumscribed. 12. Cyril then turns to the clause “coming into the world” and says it refers to the enlightened human nature, not to a soul moving from a prior place. 13. He explicitly rejects the claim that “the souls of men were preexistent in heaven before the fashioning of their bodies.” 14. He quotes the theory’s supporters as saying souls fell from a former bliss and were “entangled them with bodies of earth.” 15. He calls that reading “most ridiculous fable” and says their “empty expositions” are set against the Spirit. 16. A numbered series of arguments follows, starting with the claim that punishment and enlightenment do not match in the theory’s logic. 17. Cyril asks why believers confess the resurrection of the flesh if embodiment were already the soul’s punishment. 18. He adds examples from death, Hezekiah’s “fifteen years,” Jeremiah’s rescue, Daniel in the lions’ den, and Abraham’s promised seed. 19. The style is dense, scriptural, and disputational, with long chained sentences and repeated “Another” headings. 20. Readers interested in John 1, Cyril of Alexandria, and soul-body arguments will follow it; casual listeners looking for a short devotional reading probably will not.

As heard by us

A severe, careful rebuttal of soul preexistence, built from scripture and doctrinal logic.

The piece makes a sustained case against the claim that the soul exists before the body and that embodiment answers some earlier fault. It does not skim the issue; it moves through the argument in order, drawing on scriptural lines and pressing them toward doctrinal consequence…

Read the full review in PlayNext →

Why you'd press play

If you want a hard argument against soul preexistence, start here.

Read the full recommendation in PlayNext →

Listen to the show on

Apple Podcasts Spotify

Play clips from this episode More from Commentary on the Gospel of John, Book 1