Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans · John Calvin

016 - Romans 111-23

·46 min·3 clips

If the casting away of them reconciles the world, what shall the receiving of them be?

1. Commentary on Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans focuses on Romans 11:1-23 and Paul’s question, “Hath God cast away his people, God forbid.” 2. The speaker presents Paul as an Israelite “of the tribe of Benjamin,” which matters because it supports his refusal to treat Israel as abandoned. 3. The core question is whether the covenant made with Abraham has been abolished after Jewish unbelief and Roman-era rejection. 4. The commentary says “there can be no greater absurdity” than thinking human perfidy can weaken God’s covenant. 5. Paul’s line, “for I am an Israelite,” is used to show that the promise remains active within Israel itself. 6. The episode explains that the issue is not whether God had reasons to reject the Jews, but whether the patriarchal covenant still stands. 7. The speaker insists that adoption is “gratuitous and founded on God alone,” so the covenant cannot depend on human dignity. 8. Romans 11:2-5 is unpacked through Elijah’s complaint against Israel and God’s answer, “I have reserved to myself seven thousand men.” 9. The “seven thousand” are treated as a sign that hidden believers remain even when outward religion looks devastated. 10. The commentary warns against judging the church by visible numbers, saying a church can appear like “nothing” and still be preserved. 11. Paul’s phrase “a remnant according to the election of grace” becomes the key proof that salvation continues by secret election. 12. The speaker argues that “if by grace, then, it is no more of works,” and that works cannot share the cause of election. 13. Foreknowledge is rejected as “a certain speculative view” and instead linked to God’s sovereign purpose before people are born. 14. The discussion says God “does not internally draw any except those” who are known by his wisdom and given by the Father to the Son. 15. Romans 11:7-10 is used to explain why “the rest were blinded,” with Isaiah 6 and Psalm 69 cited as supporting texts. 16. The speaker argues that blindness and hardness are both punishment and part of the deeper logic of reprobation. 17. The section on Romans 11:11-15 says Israel’s stumble did not mean total ruin, because “salvation is come unto the Gentiles.” 18. Paul’s address, “For I speak to you Gentiles,” is treated as a strategic move to provoke Israel “to jealousy” and encourage restoration. 19. The tone is dense, argumentative, and heavily text-based, with long doctrinal exposition and repeated Scripture quotations. 20. Readers who want detailed Reformed commentary on Romans 11 will likely stay; readers wanting a brief devotional overview may skip.

As heard by us

A clear reading of grace, remnant, and the warning against pride.

Romans 11:1-23 keeps its argument steady: God has not cast away his people, and the remnant stands by grace rather than works. Paul roots that claim in his own lineage and in Elijah's report of the seven thousand, which gives the passage a grounded, scriptural weight.

Read the full review in PlayNext →

Why you'd press play

You want Romans 11 without soft-pedaling or shortcuts.

Read the full recommendation in PlayNext →

Listen to the show on

Apple Podcasts Spotify

Play clips from this episode More from Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans