Cold Case MHS: Monsters and Demons · Randy Hubbard

Season 4: Episode 3: Mr. Wrong - Murder of Jennifer Cooke

·39 min·2 clips
"If I get indicted, they will never find any physical evidence."
Cold Case MHS treats Jennifer Cook’s murder as a case that does not fit the usual high-risk pattern. The hosts and students start by talking about victim risk and why some cases look random while others connect to more obvious danger. Jennifer is described as a 35-year-old woman who lived in the Grandview Heights area just off OSU campus. She was a mother and very involved in her daughter’s life. The students say she was not really involved with drugs. That matters because the class keeps coming back to the idea that her death seemed almost impossible as a random act. It also pushed them to look harder at the people still close to her after the breakup. Daniel becomes the main focus of that discussion. He had been involved with Jennifer before her death. Even after they separated, he lived only a street away. He would show up at her house unannounced. He would also invite himself along when she went to the grocery store. The class notes that he wanted to know what she was buying and how much she was spending. That kind of behavior is treated as controlling rather than caring. The students also point to Jennifer’s finances. Daniel seemed to know a lot about them. He had control over parts of her life that should have been separate. Her mother had to come from Arizona after Jennifer died to collect her things. Daniel had possession of many of those belongings. When Jennifer’s mother tried to use Jennifer’s car to get around, Daniel refused and said he had paid for it. The students read that as another sign that he was still trying to control access to Jennifer’s life even after her death. They also describe him complaining to her mother about the publicity and the pressure on his business. That struck them as strange and emotionally flat. The episode keeps circling the same question: how much access did Daniel really have, and how much of Jennifer’s privacy had been taken away before she was killed? The students think he may have followed her to places she went on dates. They do not say that for certain. They are careful about that. What they do say is that he kept appearing where she was, and that she did not seem to want him around. The episode ends by asking whether he had a key to her house. The overall effect is a slow, cautious investigation that stays rooted in what the students can support and where the record still feels incomplete.

As heard by us

A careful student-led investigation into a murder that seemed very low risk.

This episode offers a student-led look at Jennifer Cook, a 35-year-old mother whose murder did not fit the high-risk patterns the class had been discussing.

Read the full review in PlayNext →

Why you'd press play

If you want a low-risk case built around one woman's relationships and the control around her, start here.

Read the full recommendation in PlayNext →
Listen to the show on