Quien mató el cine religioso Ep 23

·1 hr 4 min·5 clips

Two Mexican film critics investigate why religious movies vanished from theaters, blaming liberals and conservative gatekeepers.

1. Churros y Palomitas, episode 23, is hosted by Dan and Román, who frame the episode as an investigation into who killed religious cinema, timed around the Semana Santa tradition of watching biblical films on Mexican broadcast television. 2. Dan brings industry analysis expertise; Román describes a personal trajectory from Catholic upbringing through declared atheism to current pastafarian with a Hindu collar, and both acknowledge they approach religion differently. 3. The central thesis is that religious cinema was not killed but stigmatized — by Hollywood liberal culture, by audiences who reflexively avoid explicitly labeled religious content, and by scandals like the Boston church abuse cases that contaminated the entire category. 4. Román argues that El Príncipe de Egipto (The Prince of Egypt) succeeds because the Moses hero-with-a-mission framework is universally legible across Jewish, Christian, and Muslim audiences, effectively serving three audience quadrants simultaneously. 5. The hosts note that cinema was barely two years old when the first film about the Passion of Christ appeared — circa 1897 — positioning religious storytelling as one of the oldest recurring commercial impulses in the medium. 6. Mel Gibson's La Pasión de Cristo (2004) is cited as the modern benchmark: self-financed at $30 million after every Hollywood studio passed, it grossed $612 million worldwide with $370 million domestic. 7. Dan walks through Hollywood profit mathematics for Gibson: roughly half the gross goes to exhibitors, leaving around $300 million to the production; with a dual producer-director credit, Dan estimates Gibson personally cleared approximately $60 million. 8. Román recalls the cultural phenomenon of women fainting during screenings in Mexico, and both hosts agree Mel Gibson's directorial affinity for gore was amplified in the crucifixion sequences to a degree they felt exceeded plausible historical survivability. 9. Gibson has announced a sequel, La Resurrección de Cristo, to be released by Lionsgate in two parts — the first reportedly in March 2027 around Ash Wednesday and the second around Easter, structured similarly to Kevin Costner's two-part Horizon gamble. 10. Angel Studios, founded in 2013 with 55 angel investors, is described as having a business model built on creating content outside the Hollywood liberal system and targeting conservative and religious audiences that mainstream studios ignore. 11. The hosts note Angel Studios will have a first-day presentation at CinemaCon in Las Vegas alongside major studios — a signal Dan uses to argue they have reached industry legitimacy, though he still calls them overvalued like A24 and MUBI. 12. Sound of Freedom's financial breakdown: $14.5 million production cost, $5 million raised through a 'buy a ticket for a stranger' crowdfunding campaign, $250 million global gross, and an additional $5 million in physical DVD and Blu-ray sales — the latter attributed to older conservative audiences who still buy discs and churches that sold them at stalls. 13. Román raises skepticism about Sound of Freedom's reported numbers, noting that the donation-ticket model made box office tracking opaque and allowed for potential inflation, though Dan argues the broad tracking numbers were corroborated enough to be directionally reliable. 14. Angel Studios' series The Chosen, currently in its fifth or sixth season, has screened individual episodes in cinemas as congregational events — Dan notes it is easier for a pastor to organize 100 parishioners in one theater than in someone's living room. 15. The Mexican film Bendito Corazón is analyzed as a domestic case study: made by Chisco Films, a wedding photographer turned filmmaker from San Miguel del Alto, Jalisco, it cost 1.5 million pesos (which Dan argues was likely even less), was filmed in nine days, and grossed nearly 50 million pesos. 16. Dan reveals the film embeds a 15-minute commercial for the popsicle industry and a 15-minute tourism segment for the filming town — suggesting significant corporate subsidy that would make the actual production cost to the filmmakers near zero. 17. The film leveraged Father Arturo Cornejo, a priest influencer, to drive audiences; without him, the actual cast — which includes actors from Televisa telenovelas — would not have drawn viewers. 18. The episode tone is playful and conversational, with Dan taking the more analytical industry role and Román providing cultural commentary and self-deprecating confessions about his own complicated relationship with religion. 19. Film and television industry professionals, Mexican cinema enthusiasts, or anyone interested in how conservative and religious audiences are exploited as an underserved market will find the episode's financial breakdowns substantive. 20. Listeners who want film criticism or discussion of the artistic merits of individual films will find the episode leans heavily toward industry economics and audience demographics rather than the content of the films.

Listen to the show on

Apple Podcasts Spotify

Play clips from this episode More from Churros y Palomitas