Cato Cage Match: Education vs. Health Care

·33 min·3 clips

Michael Cannon and Neil McCluskey debate whose policy area—education or healthcare—is more messed up by government.

In this episode of the Cato Podcast, hosts Michael Cannon and Neil McCluskey engage in a long-standing debate about whether education or healthcare is more negatively impacted by government intervention. McCluskey, Director of the Center for Educational Freedom, argues that education is more problematic because it starts from a presumption of government provision and compulsory attendance, creating a monopoly that controls thought and beliefs. He explains that K-12 education has near-universal government funding, estimated at 95%, and highlights the historical context of common schooling. Cannon, Director of Health Policy Studies, counters that healthcare is more messed up, citing government interference that prevents market forces, leading to the most expensive and gap-ridden system globally. He notes that government controls 84% of health spending through direct funding and compulsory private spending. The discussion expands to higher education, where McCluskey draws parallels to healthcare subsidies, arguing that government aid drives up prices in both sectors. They explore data comparisons, with McCluskey providing estimates for education funding and Cannon referencing OECD statistics. The hosts also envision libertarian alternatives: McCluskey proposes a system where families and civil society take primary responsibility for education, with government intervention only in cases of neglect, while Cannon advocates for respecting individual rights in healthcare decisions to lower costs and improve access. They touch on themes of overconsumption, wasteful spending, and the role of federalism. The episode ends with each host promoting recent publications and social media accounts, including McCluskey's work in Cato's Free Society magazine and Cannon's recommendation of Dr. Jeffrey Singer's book 'Your Body, Your Healthcare'.

As heard by us

A long-running Cato debate frames education and health care as competing case studies in government damage.

Michael Cannon and Neil McCluskey return to a long-running Cato Institute debate over where government has done more damage: health care or education.

Read the full review in PlayNext →

Why you'd press play

You get a Cato policy cage match over which system government has wrecked more: education or health care.

Read the full recommendation in PlayNext →

Listen to the show on

Apple Podcasts Spotify

Play clips from this episode More from Cato Podcast