Can we talk about...? A podcast on leading for racial equity in philanthropy · Philanthropy Northwest

Seth Kirby and Sharon Miracle on real vs perceived risk and how funders can mitigate risk for their community

·56 min·3 clips

Seth Kirby says the best way to mitigate risk is to focus on relationships.

The conversation starts by pushing back on traditional return-on-investment thinking. It asks a simpler and harder question: what happens if the work is not done at all? That becomes the episode's main point. Risk is not only about whether a grant might fail. It is also about the time, energy, and money lost when a community's request is ignored. The show stays close to the practical realities of philanthropy. Guests talk about what it means to lead for racial equity when the political climate is unstable. They mention executive orders, lawsuits, and wider pressure on the nonprofit sector. They also note that a very large EPA grant was lost because of some of those decisions. Rather than treating the moment as abstract, they describe a concrete review of their public-facing language. The organization scanned its entire website. It checked policies and procedures. It looked for wording that could be used against the institution or the community it serves. That review did not turn up much to change. What it did reveal was a need to describe the work more clearly through an equitable lens. The discussion then turns to a scholarship with a very specific target group. The original design was tied to women and women of color. The guests explain how they returned to the scholarship's intent and asked how to preserve it without adding unnecessary exclusion. That section shows the kind of creative problem-solving the show values. The episode keeps coming back to the same point. Good philanthropy is not only about avoiding danger. It is about noticing where inaction keeps institutions from doing what communities actually need. The tone stays thoughtful and grounded throughout. The guests speak with practical urgency about the consequences of these choices and the work still ahead. By the end, the episode leaves the sense that equity work in philanthropy is ongoing practice, not a slogan. It is about asking the harder question of what disappears if funders choose not to move.

As heard by us

A practical look at how philanthropy weighs risk when community need comes first.

It looks at what risk means when philanthropy is meant to serve a community instead of protecting itself. The strongest stretch moves from principle to practice: checking a website, revising policy language, and reshaping a scholarship so it keeps its intent without shutting…

Read the full review in PlayNext →

Why you'd press play

If you want to rethink risk from the community's side, start here.

Read the full recommendation in PlayNext →

Listen to the show on

Apple Podcasts Spotify

Play clips from this episode More from Can we talk about...? A podcast on leading for racial equity in philanthropy