Breakaway, The Minor Hockey Podcast · Ontario Minor Hockey Association

Episode 153 | Growing the Game to Benefit the Sport (Glen Andresen)

·1 hr 18 min·3 clips

Why Minnesota dominates NHL player production

Breakaway starts in a loose, familiar way, with Aaron Wilber sounding run down and Ian Taylor checking in from the OMHA side. They talk about playoff season, a sore voice, and the Squamish U6 program. The first big thread is a jamboree for young players who are just getting real game experience. The setup is simple and lively, with games at both ends of the rink and short breaks so every child gets a turn. That leads naturally into Glenn Andresen's wider view of minor hockey. He talks as if the goal is to remove friction for families, not pile more of it on. The conversation keeps coming back to the idea that hockey should not need a huge financial or logistical commitment before a child can enjoy it. Glenn pushes against the assumption that success has to mean expensive travel, missed school, or academy fees. He brings up the kind of parent talk that happens at work or around the water cooler. The dance-dad comparison lands because it captures a familiar family calculation about time, money, and long commitments. From there, the episode broadens into a practical challenge to hockey associations. If the sport wants new families, it has to make the entry path feel possible instead of intimidating. That means being honest about what hockey can be, not just the most resource-heavy version of it. The hosts and Glenn treat that as a retention problem as much as a growth problem. If a family feels boxed out early, the game loses them before it can become part of their routine. The discussion also shows how local hockey people think about culture, not just programming. The Squamish example gives the conversation a concrete starting point. It is about first games, small rinks, snacks on the bench, and kids getting a chance to participate. The larger point is that those details matter because they shape a family's memory of the sport. The back half of the conversation stays warm and conversational even as it gets more pointed about perception. Glenn argues that people often imagine hockey as an expensive, all-consuming experience when it does not have to be that way. The hosts agree that changing that perception is part of the work. The episode closes on a more personal and reflective note, with a nod to Duluth, Minnesota as a place with outsized hockey influence. That ending gives the talk a sense of continuity, as if the sport is built through local people passing along ideas and habits. The overall feel is patient and informal, but the message is clear. Make the game accessible, keep the experience positive, and more families will stay with it. The episode never pretends there is a perfect fix. It treats youth hockey as something you improve by making a hundred small decisions with kids and parents in mind.

As heard by us

A grounded case for keeping minor hockey cheaper, simpler, and easier for families to stay with.

The episode argues that minor hockey works better when it stays cheaper, simpler, and less punishing for families. Ian Taylor and Aaron Wilber keep returning to the same point: if the sport asks for too much travel, too much money, or too much pressure, it pushes new families…

Read the full review in PlayNext →

Why you'd press play

You want a calmer, smarter look at how minor hockey can stay easier to join.

Read the full recommendation in PlayNext →

Listen to the show on

Apple Podcasts Spotify

Play clips from this episode More from Breakaway, The Minor Hockey Podcast