Branches of Philosophy Podcast · Philosophy Cognitive Science

[210] A Theory of Sentience By Austen Clark

August 2, 2025·54 min·25 clips
It begins with a stark thought experiment about slowly losing vision, hearing, taste, smell, pain, temperature, and even proprioception. The question is blunt: what, if anything, remains? That setup shifts the discussion away from consciousness in the broadest sense and toward sentience, understood as raw sensation and qualia. The episode treats Austin Clark's A Theory of Sentience as careful philosophy rather than a fresh brain theory. It uses the book to clarify what sensation is and how it fits with conscious experience. From there, the conversation turns to projection. Afterimages are the first concrete example. A lingering visual blob can seem to sit out in the world rather than inside the head. Emmert's law sharpens the point. An afterimage projected on a near wall looks small, while the same afterimage projected onto a distant mountain looks huge, even though the retinal angle stays constant. The episode asks whether this means blueness in the sky is literally a property of the mind thrown outward. The answer is more careful than a simple yes. A literal projectivist might say that. More common is figurative projection, where spatial character is understood as arising from projecting mental qualities onto phenomenal properties that characterize regions of space. Some philosophers connect that move to intentionality, so sensation is not merely internal but directed toward a place. On that view, the place a sensation projects to is the place it is about. Clark then pushes back against treating location as just another sensory quality. He introduces the partition argument to separate the properties that determine qualitative identity from the properties that do not. The birdcall example makes the distinction vivid. Two cheeps can match in pitch, timbre, and loudness and still count as different events if they come from different places. Location, then, helps distinguish occurrences without being identical to the bare feel of the experience. The episode keeps testing each idea against common sense as it goes. It does not linger in atmosphere for its own sake. Instead, it moves briskly from one clarification to the next. That pace helps the abstract material stay usable. The closing questions widen the frame again. If sentience is about how experience gets placed and differentiated, what does that say about embodiment? What does it suggest about how other animals experience the world? The episode leaves the listener with the idea that sensation is not just a private blur but a system for placing features and building a world moment by moment.

As heard by us

A steady tour of sentience, projection, and why location matters in experience.

The episode starts with a hard thought experiment: if vision, hearing, pain, temperature, and even proprioception dropped out, what would still count as experience? That setup gives Austin Clark's A Theory of Sentience a clear target.

Read the full review in PlayNext →

Why you'd press play

For when you want philosophy that starts with losing every sense and keeps going.

Read the full recommendation in PlayNext →
Listen to the show on