Branches of Philosophy Podcast · Philosophy Cognitive Science

[202] Mind: Your Consciousness is What and Where? By Ted Honderich

·25 min·1 clip

Actualism says that seeing the room is a subjective physical world outside your head.

1. Branches of Philosophy Podcast examines Ted Honderich’s Mind: Your Consciousness is What and Where? around the question of what consciousness is and where it is located. 2. The discussion centers on Ted Honderich as the book’s author and the episode hosts as readers of his argument, because they frame the book’s claim that the field lacks a shared starting point. 3. The episode asks what consciousness is for, and whether it can be clarified before philosophers move to the mind-body problem, subjectivity, and location. 4. The first major division is perceptual consciousness, defined by seeing, hearing, sensing the room, and noticing traffic outside. 5. The second division is cognitive consciousness, described as thinking, inner monologue, beliefs, intentions, and propositional attitudes. 6. The third division is affective consciousness, covering wanting, feeling, desiring, emotions, values, and inclinations. 7. Those three sides are then linked to the mind-body problem, physicalism versus dualism, and the question of whether consciousness is inside the skull or somehow out there. 8. The episode says Honderich also treats subjectivity as part of the data, using David Hume’s search for a self as a reference point. 9. Five candidate definitions are then critiqued: qualia, Nagel’s “what it is like,” traditional subjectivity, intentionality, and phenomenality. 10. Qualia are presented as the redness of red and the painfulness of pain, but the critique says they describe a quality of consciousness rather than consciousness itself. 11. Nagel’s bat-style formula is treated as capturing the mystery without explaining what “something it is like” actually consists in. 12. Traditional subjectivity is criticized for circularity because it defines consciousness through a self while the self is usually defined through consciousness. 13. Intentionality, or aboutness, is said to be too vague to cover both external objects and inner states, and it struggles with raw feel. 14. Phenomenality is separated from access consciousness, with access defined as information available for report or action, not the basic fact of being conscious. 15. Honderich’s “database” gathers ordinary descriptors such as being had by you, being given, being present, being known directly, and being vivid. 16. That database is reduced to one central claim: consciousness is actuality. 17. The episode then sets criteria for a good theory: it must answer the what-and-where questions, preserve causal efficacy, remain consistent with naturalism, explain the brain relation, account for subjectivity, and distinguish perception, thinking, and wanting. 18. Dualism and abstract functionalism are both criticized because one makes causal interaction hard to explain and the other risks making consciousness too abstract and epiphenomenal. 19. The tone is academic and explanatory, with the speakers unpacking terms, using comparisons like the bent stick in water, and moving carefully through Honderich’s framework. 20. Listeners who like philosophy of mind, consciousness, and careful argument will get the most from it, while people looking for a short summary of neuroscience may skip it.

Listen to the show on

Apple Podcasts Spotify

Play clips from this episode More from Branches of Philosophy Podcast